Hi Harald,
This looks good to me. The testcase gives the same result with other brands.
OK for mainline and for backporting.
Thanks
Paul
On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 22:12, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> here's another small fix: IS_CONTIGUOUS did erroneously always
> return .true. for CLAS
Hi Chung-Lin!
On 2024-03-07T17:02:02+0900, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> On 2023/10/26 6:43 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> +++ b/gcc/tree.h
>> @@ -1813,6 +1813,14 @@ class auto_suppress_location_wrappers
>> #define OMP_CLAUSE_MAP_DECL_MAKE_ADDRESSABLE(NODE) \
>> (OMP_CLAUSE_SUBCODE
Hello,
I am trying to link gfortran routines which call assembly routines. The linker
cannot find these assembly routines although they have been
assembled using "as" and stored in a static library using "ar".
I have used the following options when assembling:
-c --32 -a=list_file_name -o o
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:05:16PM +, Ken Woolridge wrote:
>
> When I attempt to link my test program (FF.F90) which calls UPPER_CASE (an
> assembly routine) I get the following error:
>
> C:/Program
> Files/GCC/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/13.2.0/../../../../i686-pc-mingw32/bin/ld.exe:
>
Hi Chung-Lin, hi Thomas, hello world,
some thoughts glancing at the patch.
Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
There is still some shortcomings in the current state, mainly that only explicit-shaped
arrays can be used (like its C counterpart). Anything else is currently a bit more
complicated in the middle
