See PR for a discussion whether this change is required for alignment (or
other) reasons
(looks as if not) - or"just" to match the indented order (arg names +
description) and
to silence a -Walloc-size warning.
Committed as r14-5148-g17df6ddcf11aef
(BTW: I don't think that it is worthwhile to
Remove the early return present in function templates for transformational
functions doing a (masked) reduction of an array along a dimension.
This early return, which triggered if the extent in the reduction dimension
was zero, was wrong because even if the reduction operation degenerates to
a con
Hello,
while preparing a testcase, I encountered a bug which I filed as
PR112371. Investigating further, I found two different problems which I
propose to fix with the followup patches.
Those have been bootstraped and regression tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
OK for master?
Mikael
Mikael Mori
Hi Mikael,
Am 06.11.23 um 12:43 schrieb Mikael Morin:
Remove the early return present in function templates for transformational
functions doing a (masked) reduction of an array along a dimension.
This early return, which triggered if the extent in the reduction dimension
was zero, was wrong bec
Hi Mikael,
Am 06.11.23 um 12:43 schrieb Mikael Morin:
Remove the forced overwrite of the first dimension of the result array
descriptor to set it to zero extent, in the function templates for
transformational functions doing an array reduction along a dimension. This
overwrite, which happened b
Le 06/11/2023 à 19:12, Harald Anlauf a écrit :
Hi Mikael,
Am 06.11.23 um 12:43 schrieb Mikael Morin:
Remove the early return present in function templates for
transformational
functions doing a (masked) reduction of an array along a dimension.
This early return, which triggered if the extent i
Le 06/11/2023 à 19:20, Harald Anlauf a écrit :
Hi Mikael,
Am 06.11.23 um 12:43 schrieb Mikael Morin:
Remove the forced overwrite of the first dimension of the result array
descriptor to set it to zero extent, in the function templates for
transformational functions doing an array reduction alon
Hi Mikael,
Am 06.11.23 um 20:19 schrieb Mikael Morin:
This change to the testcase:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bound_11.f90
b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bound_11.f90
index 170eba4ddfd..2e96f843476 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bound_11.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/bou
