Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] RFC: P1689R5 support

2022-10-19 Thread Martin Liška
On 10/18/22 14:22, Ben Boeckel wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 13:08:46 -0400, David Malcolm wrote: >> On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 16:21 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote: >>> David Malcolm would probably know best about JSON wrangling. >> >> Unfortunately our JSON output doesn't make any guarantees about the

[Patch] Fortran: Fix non_negative_strides_array_p

2022-10-19 Thread Tobias Burnus
First, I am woefully aware that there several patches pending. I hope to do a couple of reviews later today or in the next days. Otherwise, I did run into another issue in existing code which was exposed by the delinearization patch on the OG12 branch, but could potentially lead to wrong code on

[OG12][committed] Fortran: Fix delinearization regression

2022-10-19 Thread Tobias Burnus
As mentioned in the patch submission for "Fortran: Fix non_negative_strides_array_p", there were some issues on OG12 which uses Sandra's delinearization patch (and was forward ported from OG11) This patch fixes one issue, caused by a GCC 12 change. At some point, we could think of using the deli

[PATCH] Fortran: error recovery with references of bad array constructors [PR105633]

2022-10-19 Thread Harald Anlauf via Fortran
Dear Fortranners, here's another patch that improves error receovery with references of bad array constructors leading to an ICE after a NULL pointer dereference. Original patch by Steve, which I amended with a logic cleanup. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline? Thanks, Harald F