On 2021/10/21 12:15 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
+program main
+ integer :: x, i, n
+
+ !$omp parallel
+ block
+x = x + 1
+ end block
I'd prefer not to use those x = j or x = x + 1 etc.
as statements that do random work here whenever possible.
While those are dg-do compile testcases, espec
I've checked in the attached patch to announce the cleanup project that
Tobias and I have been working on over the last several months in the
GCC 12 release notes. I also updated the page for TS29113 on the GCC
wiki to reflect that anything that still doesn't work ought to be
considered a bug,
Hi Sandra,
I've checked in the attached patch to announce the cleanup project that
Tobias and I have been working on over the last several months in the
GCC 12 release notes. I also updated the page for TS29113 on the GCC
wiki to reflect that anything that still doesn't work ought to be
cons
PR100906 ("Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1") has been
fixed by Tobias's rewrite of the GFC <-> C descriptor conversions. I'd
like to add José's testcase for that issue before closing it. OK?
-Sandra
commit 4c2fa9cf74162015710ccfd913c827779151aa52
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Date
Hi Sandra,
PR100906 ("Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1") has been
fixed by Tobias's rewrite of the GFC <-> C descriptor conversions. I'd
like to add José's testcase for that issue before closing it. OK?
OK. I think adding undisputed passing test cases from PRs for somethin
