PING**2
On 25.08.21 20:58, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Early *PING*.
(I also should still review several Fortan patches... There are lots of
patches waiting for review :-/)
On 20.08.21 19:24, Tobias Burnus wrote:
The following is about interoperability (BIND(C)) only.
* The patch adds a missing che
Hi all, hi Richard,
On 27.08.21 21:48, Richard Biener wrote:
It looks really nice with "-O1 -fno-inline" :-)
The callee 'rank_p()' is mostly optimized and in the
caller only those struct elements are set, which are used:
integer(kind=4) rank_p (struct CFI_cdesc_t & _this)
{
_1 = _thi
Hi all,
I want to note that the FortranCon 2021 is in the same week as the GNU
Tools @ Linux Plumbers Conference,
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/linuxplumbers2021 – Mon 20 to Fri 24 September,
07:00–11:00 a.m. PDT / 16:00–20:00 CEST with submission deadline next
Tuesday.
While the FortranCon is T
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:14:09PM +0200, Marcel Vollweiler wrote:
> Add support for device-modifiers for 'omp target device'.
>
> 'device_num' and 'ancestor' are now parsed on target device constructs for C,
> C++, and Fortran (see OpenMP specification 5.0, p. 170). When 'ancestor' is
> used, th
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 10:07 AM Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> Hi all, hi Richard,
>
> On 27.08.21 21:48, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> It looks really nice with "-O1 -fno-inline" :-)
> >>The callee 'rank_p()' is mostly optimized and in the
> >>caller only those struct elements are set, which ar
