Hi Harald,
On 26.07.21 23:55, Harald Anlauf wrote:
I've updated this for ALLOCATE/DEALLOCATE and STAT/ERRMSG, see
attached patch. This required updating the error messages of
two existing files in the testsuite.
Thanks.
Also affected: Some I/O items, a bunch of other stat=%v and
errmsg=%v.
W
The automatic regression test of Sunil wrote:
On 26.07.21 19:27, sunil.k.pandey wrote:
commit 0cbf03689e3e7d9d6002b8e5d159ef3716d0404c
PR fortran/93308/93963/94327/94331/97046 problems raised by descriptor
handling
caused
FAIL: gfortran.dg/PR93963.f90 -O2 execution test
...
(That's on
Hi Sandra, hi Thomas, hi all,
@Thomas K: Comments about the following - and of course to the
testsuite itself - are highly welcome.
In my opinion, the testsuite LGTM and can be committed.
@Sandra:
- Thoughts on the directory name? (cf. below)
- Give others/Thomas a chance to comment on this,
On 18.07.21 06:36, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
This patch fixes bugs I observed in tests for the CFI_section function
-- it turns out both the function and test cases had bugs. :-(
The bugs in CFI_section itself had to do with incorrect computation of
the base address for the result descriptor, plus
Hi Tobias,
> > We should rather open a separate PR on auditing the related uses
> > of gfc_match.
>
> I concur – I just wanted to quickly check how many %v are there –
> besides %v, there are also direct calls to gfc_match_variable.
>
> Can you open a PR?
this is now https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
On 7/26/21 2:13 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 7/26/21 3:45 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
[snip]
PS: Still, it would be nice if the proper multi-lib ISO*.h could be
found;
while it usually does not matter, it could do so in some cases.
I think I ought to fix this now instead of just sweeping it
