I noticed other attributes have been added now. What happened to
target_clones, in particular? (Thanks for working on it.)
Hi!
On Mon, 07 Nov 2022 11:04:17 +
Dave Love via Fortran wrote:
> Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran writes:
>
> > I see.
> > So target_clones is one thing. What other attributes would be important?
>
> At least optimization-related ones could be useful, and possibly others.
> I haven
Thomas Koenig via Fortran writes:
> Hi Bernhard,
>
>> If you think that we want to add support for that attribute, i can
>> submit a proper patch. Just let me know please.
>
> I think this attribute makes sense, especially if people want to
> compile once and then port to different architectures.
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran writes:
> I see.
> So target_clones is one thing. What other attributes would be important?
At least optimization-related ones could be useful, and possibly others.
I haven't made a list, but could do.
> In your job script you would use cpuid(1) to determine
Hi Bernhard,
If you think that we want to add support for that attribute, i can
submit a proper patch. Just let me know please.
I think this attribute makes sense, especially if people want to
compile once and then port to different architectures.
So, yes please submit a patch, if you would b
On Sat, 5 Nov 2022 08:40:06 +0100
Thomas Koenig wrote:
> On 04.11.22 21:59, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran wrote:
> > And not sure if fellow gfortraners would accept this attribute
> > target_clones in there in the first place..
>
> It might actually be useful. Is there any change about
On 04.11.22 21:59, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran wrote:
And not sure if fellow gfortraners would accept this attribute
target_clones in there in the first place..
It might actually be useful. Is there any change about
the calling sequence or anything else that should be visible
in a For
On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 00:19:26 +0100
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> So target_clones is one thing. What other attributes would be important?
> > doing something previously! (I don't know if I'll actually be able to
> > work on it in the end, at least on work time.)
>
> heh, me neither. Lucki
On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 21:19:18 +
Dave Love via Fortran wrote:
> Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran writes:
> > Ideally the syntax would be the same as in C.
>
> Right. I hoped it would be possible to lift machinery easily from C.
Lifting that won't work easily, no.
> There's no standa
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Fortran writes:
> Well we already have
> !GCC$ ATTRIBUTES attribute-list :: var-name [, var-name] ...
>
> See https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/ATTRIBUTES-directive.html
Yes, that's what I was hoping was simple to extend. Sorry I didn't say
explicitly.
> For
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:35:45 +0100
Dave Love via Fortran wrote:
> Assuming there's no technical reason not to, can someone say what would
> be involved in adding relevant attributes (at least function ones) like
> those for C? I'm thinking particularly of target_clones, but others
> probably mak
Assuming there's no technical reason not to, can someone say what would
be involved in adding relevant attributes (at least function ones) like
those for C? I'm thinking particularly of target_clones, but others
probably make sense.
I don't know my way around, but I had a quick look, and it at le
12 matches
Mail list logo
