I think your good to go. Thanks for patch!
On Mon, Oct 7, 2024, 2:12 AM Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> this patch looks very similar to previous ones. I therefore deem it ok for
> mainline. May be you want to wait for Jerry to voice his ok/findings
> before you
> apply it.
>
> Thanks
Hi Thomas,
this patch looks very similar to previous ones. I therefore deem it ok for
mainline. May be you want to wait for Jerry to voice his ok/findings before you
apply it.
Thanks for the patch.
- Andre
On Sun, 6 Oct 2024 08:58:30 -0700
Jerry Delisle wrote:
> The iparm.m4 was what I was lo
The iparm.m4 was what I was looking for. Thanks,
Jerry
On Sun, Oct 6, 2024, 5:26 AM Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Am 05.10.24 um 22:52 schrieb Thomas Koenig:
> > Hi Jerry,
> >
> >> I see all the generated files in the patch, but I do not see the M4
> >> macro or other mechanism which generated these.
Am 05.10.24 um 22:52 schrieb Thomas Koenig:
Hi Jerry,
I see all the generated files in the patch, but I do not see the M4
macro or other mechanism which generated these. Was this in a
previous submission that I missed?
The "magic" in this case is mentioning them in Makefile.am and
(regenera
Hi Jerry,
I see all the generated files in the patch, but I do not see the M4
macro or other mechanism which generated these. Was this in a previous
submission that I missed?
The "magic" in this case is mentioning them in Makefile.am and
(regenerated) in Makefile.in.
The rest is done by the
On 10/4/24 12:54 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Hello world,
please find attached the patch for implementing MAXLOC and MINLOC
for unsigned.
The patch is rather lengthy, but mostly due to combinatorial
explosion
with the different return values.
Next time we update the ABI, we should treat MAXLOC
