Hi,
>> Why looping over fields? The class type is a simple type with only one
>> member (and it should be an integer, we can assert that).
>
> I wanted to make sure it has exactly one field.
> The ieee_arithmetic.F90 module in libgfortran surely does that, but I've
> been worrying about some use
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 10:00:02PM +0200, FX wrote:
> I have two questions, on this and the ieee_class patch:
>
>
> > + tree type = TREE_TYPE (arg);
> > + gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (type) == RECORD_TYPE);
> > + tree field = NULL_TREE;
> > + for (tree f = TYPE_FIELDS (type); f != NULL_TREE; f = DE
Hi Jakub,
I have two questions, on this and the ieee_class patch:
> + tree type = TREE_TYPE (arg);
> + gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (type) == RECORD_TYPE);
> + tree field = NULL_TREE;
> + for (tree f = TYPE_FIELDS (type); f != NULL_TREE; f = DECL_CHAIN (f))
> +if (TREE_CODE (f) == FIELD_DECL)
>
Hi!
The following patch expands IEEE_VALUE function inline in the FE.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, i686-linux, powerpc64le-linux
and powerpc64-linux, ok for trunk?
2022-08-15 Jakub Jelinek
PR fortran/106579
* trans-intrinsic.cc: Include realmpfr.h.
(conv_in
