Hi Mikael, team,
> Thanks. Pushed:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=90045c5df5b3c8853e7740fb72a11aead1c489bb
Pushed a further commit to XFAIL the testcases on x87:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=86e3b476d5defaa79c94d40b76cbeec21cd02e5f
There the ABI does not allow
Thanks Mikael,
> This looks good to me. Thanks.
Thanks. Pushed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=90045c5df5b3c8853e7740fb72a11aead1c489bb
FX
Hello,
Le 10/01/2022 à 18:32, FX via Fortran a écrit :
Hi,
Second part of a three-patch series to fix PR 82207
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82207), making gfortran handle
signaling NaNs. This part fixes the library code implementing IEEE_VALUE. To do
so, I switched that part
Hi,
Second part of a three-patch series to fix PR 82207
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82207), making gfortran handle
signaling NaNs. This part fixes the library code implementing IEEE_VALUE. To do
so, I switched that part of library code from Fortran to C, because in C we
have
