Re: [PATCH, RFC] Fortran: do not copy back for parameter actual arguments [PR81978]

Hi Paul, Am 20.01.25 um 11:29 schrieb Paul Richard Thomas: Hi Harald, How did we miss that one for so long? This is certainly OK for mainline and, I would suggest, 14-branch. alright, will do that. Thanks for the patch. Thanks for the review! Harald Paul On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 at 20:42,

Re: [PATCH, RFC] Fortran: do not copy back for parameter actual arguments [PR81978]

Hi Harald, How did we miss that one for so long? This is certainly OK for mainline and, I would suggest, 14-branch. Thanks for the patch. Paul On Sun, 19 Jan 2025 at 20:42, Harald Anlauf wrote: > Dear all, > > this patch addresses a long-standing difference between gfortran and > other brand

[PATCH, RFC] Fortran: do not copy back for parameter actual arguments [PR81978]

Dear all, this patch addresses a long-standing difference between gfortran and other brands: when an array actual argument was passed to a procedure, and the dummy argument had no intent specified, we would often create packing and unpacking code. Only the case of the dummy argument having inten