On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Anyone: comments are welcome.
> + The standard C++ library (libstdc++) is now supported
I wouldn't mark up libstdc++ as in this context; we are pretty much
treating it as a proper name/project name.
(Two occurrences.)
Looks good to me otherwise, t
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> * https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/gomp/
This is a no-brainer. Please go ahead and push (and any such changes in
the future).
It does make me wonder whether we really need/want distinct docs for minor
releases or shouldn't better keep just one for the br
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Comments, remarks to, approval of the attached wwwdocs patch?
+ Experimental support for unsigned integers; enabled by the
+ -funsigned, see https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Experimental-features-for-Fortran-202Y.html";
+ >gfortran docu
he Fortran parse tree.
>
> Might it be that it should say "... manipulating parts _of_ the Fortran
> parse tree."?
Yes, I believe you're right, so went ahead and pushed the following
change.
Thank you,
Gerald
commit a071fcda136d00f8321d0adc773007f4f45020ea
Author: Gerald Pf
The new site does not offer https, so staying with http.
Pushed.
Gerald
On the way remove a mailto: link to offer g77 help from 1999.
---
htdocs/news.html | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/news.html b/htdocs/news.html
index 5e782349..6fac4ea5 1
The original subsite has disappeared and we couldn't find it elsewhere.
Pushed.
Gerald
---
htdocs/readings.html | 6 --
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/readings.html b/htdocs/readings.html
index 784a3bd7..ae1b52bb 100644
--- a/htdocs/readings.html
+++ b/htdocs/readings.ht
On Tue, 28 May 2024, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Let's make https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-15/changes.html a bit more useful …
Always a good idea. :-)
> Thus, document selected_logical_kind and the ISO_FORTRAN_ENV additions.
>
> Comments or suggestions before I commit it?
Looks good to me, thanks.
Gerald
This has been unreachable for months (at least).
If any of you is aware of some other link to add to
https://gcc.gnu.org/benchmarks/ please let me know.
Gerald
---
htdocs/benchmarks/index.html | 7 ---
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/benchmarks/index.html b/htdocs/benchma
The original page is gone, and search engines did not reveal a new
location.
If any of you has a new location, feel free to add that (or let me
know and I'll take care).
Gerald
---
htdocs/readings.html | 5 -
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/readings.html b/htdocs/readings
On Mon, 30 Jan 2023, Steve Kargl via Gcc wrote:
> Bingo. In the case of non-[a-zA-Z] characters in the
> Subject (or Fromi or To) line, the spam folder is normally
> named /dev/null.
Hmm, so any digit, parenthesis, or bracket in the Subject, and mails gets
to /dev/null?
Or having an umlaut or o
On Sat, 23 Oct 2021, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> @Gerald: Do you see those issues as well? Or do you have an idea what
> could go wrong?
>
> @Gerald (and unrelated to the topic below): Can you provide more log data
> regarding the failing gfortran.dg tests? (Esp. excess errors but also the
> ICE.)
Ap
On Fri, 17 Sep 2021, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> I have now committed the attached patch as r12-3621. It includes the
> patch by Sandra
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/579372.html
> (approved 3 days ago) plus adding the "== 53" similar to above.
Thank you, Tobias; thank you,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2021, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> And, related, does the following make sense and fixes the issue?
>>
>> --- a/libgfortran/ISO_Fortran_binding.h
>> +++ b/libgfortran/ISO_Fortran_binding.h
>> @@ -228,5 +228,5 @@ extern int CFI_setpointer (CFI_cdes
On Tue, 14 Sep 2021, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> And, related, does the following make sense and fixes the issue?
>
> --- a/libgfortran/ISO_Fortran_binding.h
> +++ b/libgfortran/ISO_Fortran_binding.h
> @@ -228,5 +228,5 @@ extern int CFI_setpointer (CFI_cdesc_t *, CFI_cdesc_t *,
> const CFI_index_t []);
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> Here's a patch. Gerald, can you check that this fixes your bootstrap
> problem on i586-unknown-freebsd11?
I does not change the bootstrap failure on i586-unknown-freebsd11
- though looking at the discussion here still looks like a good
change to ma
On Mon, 13 Sep 2021, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Can you run 'echo | cpp -E -g3|grep DBL' to (or in the build dir: echo |
> ./gcc/cc1 -E -g3 -dD|grep DBL) to check what's the output?
Thank you, Tobias, and I'm just testing the proposed patch, but still
wanted to follow up on your question:
% echo |
On Wed, 18 Aug 2021, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> I realized last week that having multilib-specific versions of
> ISO_Fortran_binding.h (generated by running the compiler to ask what kinds it
> supports) was still broken outside of the test support; the directory where
> it's being installed isn't on
Nino reported this last year, and I noticed this is still the case,
so went ahead and fixed this typo. Pushed.
Gerald
commit a8f588be038317bf1e9c71f7e626a3d23255ab37
Author: Gerald Pfeifer
Date: Sun May 30 15:27:53 2021 +0200
Fortran: Fix typo in documentation of BOZ
gcc
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestions.
You're always welcome!
> PS: When looking at https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html, I wondered whether
> 3 of 5 http mirrors links could move to https and given the trend that
> FTP is phased out (on the server side and in the web
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Comments? Wording suggestions? I think for OpenMP, the sentence will be
> modified several times before the release :-)
Can I take this as a promise? :-)
+
+ For Fortran, OpenMP 5.0 support has been extended for following features
+ which were be
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021, Martin Liška wrote:
> A column with empty values seems suspicious.
>
> Ready to be installed?
Yes, if you've been able to validate this visually (before/after).
Please give the Fortran folks the rest of the weekend/another 24h
to chim in.
> gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
>
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
