Hi All,
The comment in the patch and the ChangeLog explains this one and a
half liner adequately. The irony is that the error test was removed
because an error return was being called, which caused failures in
valid cases.
Regtests on FC42/x86_64. Variants of the testcase, mentioned in the
PR, ha
Am 01.10.25 um 00:35 schrieb Jerry Delisle:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2025, 12:33 PM Harald Anlauf wrote:
Dear All,
the attached patch fixes the problem that UBSAN did generate a check
of the passed stride of an optional array dummy argument even in the
case the actual was not present, as seen by the r
> On 1 Oct 2025, at 17:36, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
>
> Hi Iain,
>
>> I wil try what has been suggested - but I guess that also applying the patch
>> series to current trunk ought to work?
>
> Well, there is an additional patch needed before the patch series (attached
> here).
thanks
>>
>
Hi Jerry,
I hope you have more luck with updating the branch. The last time I did it, I
blocked the whole gcc repository for over 1.5h and the admins had to terminate
a script on the server manually. I therefore leave my fingers well clear from
doing this again.
Regards,
Andre
On Wed, 1
