Nit eradicated and pushed as r16-3590.
Thanks
Paul
On Thu, 4 Sept 2025 at 21:53, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Hi Paul!
>
> Am 04.09.25 um 20:46 schrieb Paul Richard Thomas:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > PDT components with default initializers must have type parameter and
> > length expressions that reduce t
On Thu, Sep 4, 2025 at 8:22 AM Andre Vehreschild wrote:
>
> Hi Patrick,
>
> I applied attached patch, which resolves the issue for me. @Harald does it do
> the trick for you, too?
>
> Thanks Patrick for quick resolution of the issue.
OK.
Thanks,
Richard.
> Regards,
> Andre
>
> On Wed, 3
Hi Paul!
Am 04.09.25 um 20:46 schrieb Paul Richard Thomas:
Hi All,
PDT components with default initializers must have type parameter and
length expressions that reduce to compile time integer constants. The chunk
in expr.cc verifies that this is the case for array bounds and character
lengths.
On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 10:53:48PM +0200, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Hi Paul!
>
> Am 04.09.25 um 20:46 schrieb Paul Richard Thomas:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > PDT components with default initializers must have type parameter and
> > length expressions that reduce to compile time integer constants. The chunk
Hi All,
PDT components with default initializers must have type parameter and
length expressions that reduce to compile time integer constants. The chunk
in expr.cc verifies that this is the case for array bounds and character
lengths.
This error checking results in pdt_26.f03 segfaulting because
Hi All,
Although PR87362 is marked as fixed, the error becomes rather more explicit
with this patch, which I actually developed for PR102457.
Regtests on FC42/x86_64 - OK for mainline
Paul
Change.Logs
Description: Binary data
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/decl.cc b/gcc/fortran/decl.cc
index 1e91b57
On 9/4/25 6:22 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
Hi All,
Although PR87362 is marked as fixed, the error becomes rather more explicit with
this patch, which I actually developed for PR102457.
Regtests on FC42/x86_64 - OK for mainline
Paul
Yes, OK
Swing Away.
Jerry
Hi Richard,
thanks for the "OK". But please don't expect me to merge this. I have no
experience in that part of the compiler and haven't regression tested the
patch. I hope someone with more experience in that area is willing to merge
the patch and be able to answer future questions.
Regards,
