Re: [PATCH, OpenACC 2.7] struct/array reductions for Fortran

Hi Chung-Lin, hi Thomas, hello world, some thoughts glancing at the patch. Chung-Lin Tang wrote: There is still some shortcomings in the current state, mainly that only explicit-shaped arrays can be used (like its C counterpart). Anything else is currently a bit more complicated in the middle

Re: Can't link assembly routines

On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:05:16PM +, Ken Woolridge wrote: > > When I attempt to link my test program (FF.F90) which calls UPPER_CASE (an > assembly routine) I get the following error: > > C:/Program > Files/GCC/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/13.2.0/../../../../i686-pc-mingw32/bin/ld.exe: >

Can't link assembly routines

Hello, I am trying to link gfortran routines which call assembly routines. The linker cannot find these assembly routines although they have been assembled using "as" and stored in a static library using "ar". I have used the following options when assembling: -c --32 -a=list_file_name -o o

Re: [PATCH, OpenACC 2.7, v2] readonly modifier support in front-ends

Hi Chung-Lin! On 2024-03-07T17:02:02+0900, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > On 2023/10/26 6:43 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> +++ b/gcc/tree.h >> @@ -1813,6 +1813,14 @@ class auto_suppress_location_wrappers >> #define OMP_CLAUSE_MAP_DECL_MAKE_ADDRESSABLE(NODE) \ >> (OMP_CLAUSE_SUBCODE

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix IS_CONTIGUOUS for polymorphic dummy arguments [PR114001]

Hi Harald, This looks good to me. The testcase gives the same result with other brands. OK for mainline and for backporting. Thanks Paul On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 22:12, Harald Anlauf wrote: > Dear all, > > here's another small fix: IS_CONTIGUOUS did erroneously always > return .true. for CLAS