On 2/25/24 12:26 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Dear all,
the attached simple patch fixes an issue where we evaluated
polymorphic functions twice in assignments: once for the _data
component, and once for the _vptr. Using save_expr prevents
the double evaluation.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. O
On 2/25/24 12:34 PM, Harald Anlauf wrote:
Hi Jerry,
On 2/22/24 20:11, Jerry D wrote:
Hi all,
The attached fix adds a check for an error condition from a UDDTIO
procedure in the case where there is no actual underlying error, but the
user defines an error by setting the iostat variable manually
Harald,
Thank you for reviewing my code. I've been doing research and debugging to
investigate the error thrown by Intel and NAG for the deferred parameter in
the dummy variable declaration. I found where the problem was and added the
fix as part of my patch. I've attached the patch as a file, whi
Hi Jerry,
On 2/22/24 20:11, Jerry D wrote:
Hi all,
The attached fix adds a check for an error condition from a UDDTIO
procedure in the case where there is no actual underlying error, but the
user defines an error by setting the iostat variable manually before
returning to the parent READ.
the
Dear all,
the attached simple patch fixes an issue where we evaluated
polymorphic functions twice in assignments: once for the _data
component, and once for the _vptr. Using save_expr prevents
the double evaluation.
Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for mainline?
And a backport to 13-branch
