Hi Paul,
On 9/15/23 11:13, Paul Richard Thomas via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi Harald,
The statement,
in array_bound_check_elemental is redundant since the call is
determined by a more restrictive condition.
+ if (!(gfc_option.rtcheck & GFC_RTCHECK_BOUNDS))
+return;
yeah, this was left over
Hi Mikael,
The comment is very welcome! Looks good to me. OK for mainline.
Thanks for the patch.
Paul
On Fri, 15 Sept 2023 at 08:19, Mikael Morin via Fortran
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Harald reminded me recently that there was a working patch attached to the PR.
> I added a documentation comment w
Hi Harald,
The statement,
in array_bound_check_elemental is redundant since the call is
determined by a more restrictive condition.
+ if (!(gfc_option.rtcheck & GFC_RTCHECK_BOUNDS))
+return;
Apart from that, it looks good to me. OK for mainline.
Thanks for the patch.
Paul
On Thu, 14 Sep
Hello,
Harald reminded me recently that there was a working patch attached to the PR.
I added a documentation comment with the hope that it may help avoid
making the same mistake in the future.
Regression tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
OK for master?
-- >8 --
Remove one reference count increment
