Le 04/07/2023 à 21:00, Harald Anlauf a écrit :
Hi Mikael, all,
I think I've found it: there is a call to gfc_conv_class_to_class
that - according to a comment - does a repackaging to a class array.
Deferring that repackaging along with the deallocation not only fixes
the regression, but also the
Hi Mikael, all,
I think I've found it: there is a call to gfc_conv_class_to_class
that - according to a comment - does a repackaging to a class array.
Deferring that repackaging along with the deallocation not only fixes
the regression, but also the cases I tested.
Attached is a "sneak preview",
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 11:26:26AM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Le 04/07/2023 à 01:56, Steve Kargl a écrit :
> > On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:
> > >
> > > Indeed, this is a nice demonstration.
> > >
> > > While playing, I was wondering whether the foll
I've opened PRs for both of these issues:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110547
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110548
-Andrew
--
* Andrew Benson: http://users.obs.carnegiescience.edu/abenson
* Galacticus: https://github.com/galacticusorg/galacticus
On Wed, Jun 28
Le 03/07/2023 à 22:49, Harald Anlauf a écrit :
Hi Mikael,
Am 03.07.23 um 13:46 schrieb Mikael Morin:
These look good, but I'm surprised that there is no similar change at
the 6819 line.
This is the class array actual vs class array dummy case.
It seems to be checked by the "bar" subroutine in y
Le 04/07/2023 à 01:56, Steve Kargl a écrit :
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 10:49:36PM +0200, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:
Indeed, this is a nice demonstration.
While playing, I was wondering whether the following code is conforming:
program p
call s ((1))
contains
subroutine s (x)
in
