Hi Paul,
I want to get something approaching correct finalization to the
distros, which implies 12-branch at present. Hopefully I can do the
same with associate in a month or two's time.
OK by me then.
(I just wanted to be sure that we had this discussion :-)
Best regards
Thomas
Hi Paul,
On 6/3/23 07:48, Paul Richard Thomas via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi Harald,
It looks good to me. Thanks to you and Steve for the fix. I suggest
that it is such and obvious one that it deserved back-porting.
alright, I'll check how far this makes sense.
Cheers,
Harald
Cheers
Paul
On F
Hi Paul, all,
On 6/3/23 15:16, Paul Richard Thomas via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I want to get something approaching correct finalization to the
distros, which implies 12-branch at present. Hopefully I can do the
same with associate in a month or two's time.
IMHO it is not only distros, b
Hi Thomas,
I want to get something approaching correct finalization to the
distros, which implies 12-branch at present. Hopefully I can do the
same with associate in a month or two's time.
I am dithering about changing the F2003/08 part of finalization since
the default is 2018 compliance. That s
On Sat, Jun 03, 2023 at 07:50:19AM +0200, Thomas Koenig via Fortran wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> > I propose to backport
> > r13-6747-gd7caf313525a46f200d7f5db1ba893f853774aee to 12-branch very
> > soon.
>
> Is this something that we usually do?
>
> While finalization was basically broken before, some