> If these bureaucratic parasites (but I repeat myself) don't want to
> use GCC, or Clang, then they can write their own compiler suite from
> scratch. Doubt that's going to happen, so this "investigation" is
> simply yet another frivilous waste of taxpayer dollars.
I won't blame this on bureaucra
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 14:18:40 EDT
Richard Kenner via Gcc wrote:
> > Should this question be posed to the Linux distribution that NASA is using?
>
> Yes, most likely. But exactly how Free Software fits into the
> Buy America Act (what she's talking about) is less than clear.
If these bureaucrati
> Should this question be posed to the Linux distribution that NASA is using?
Yes, most likely. But exactly how Free Software fits into the
Buy America Act (what she's talking about) is less than clear.
Should this question be posed to the Linux distribution that NASA is using?
Thanks, David
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 4:56 AM Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi Cynthia,
>
> > Hello, my name is Cynthia and I am a Supply Chain Risk Management
> > Analyst at NASA. NASA is currently conducting a sup
Hi Cynthia,
> Hello, my name is Cynthia and I am a Supply Chain Risk Management
> Analyst at NASA. NASA is currently conducting a supply chain
> assessment of gfortran. As stated in Sections 208 and 514 of the
> Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law 117-103,
> enacted March 15, 2022
