Hi,
Fortran 2018 added some synonyms to the existing IEEE_CLASS_TYPE values, namely
IEEE_NEGATIVE_SUBNORMAL (which is the same as IEEE_NEGATIVE_DENORMAL)
and IEEE_POSITIVE_SUBNORMAL (same as IEEE_POSITIVE_DENORMAL). When they
were added to the C side, they were not kept in sync with the Fortran
pa
Hi Paul,
Am 29.12.21 um 12:45 schrieb Paul Richard Thomas via Fortran:
Hi Harald,
That is the sort of thing that I had in mind. Is it worth adding the check
for CLASS_DATA? I cannot remember if that is made redundant by the test of
the class_ok attribute.
the macro CLASS_DATA appears to have
Hi,
In order to finalize our support for Fortran IEEE modules, we need to have
access to a reliable issignaling() macro, that would work across all
floating-point types. Some targets (glibc ones, notably) have it, but not all,
far from it. Instead of implementing our own, probably buggy, probab
Hi Harald,
That is the sort of thing that I had in mind. Is it worth adding the check
for CLASS_DATA? I cannot remember if that is made redundant by the test of
the class_ok attribute.
Cheers
Paul
On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 at 21:08, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Am 28.12.21 um 12:56 schrieb
