Re: [RFC] User-visible changes for powerpc64-le-linux ABI changes

2021-11-15 Thread Thomas Koenig via Fortran
On 16.11.21 00:42, Michael Meissner wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 09:27:38PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote: Hi, is there an update on this? I am still waiting on a response for the account on the development machine. I assume we would to the development on a branch. My git fu is extremely weak

Re: [RFC] User-visible changes for powerpc64-le-linux ABI changes

2021-11-15 Thread Michael Meissner via Fortran
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 09:27:38PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Hi, > > is there an update on this? I am still waiting on a response for > the account on the development machine. > > I assume we would to the development on a branch. My git fu > is extremely weak, so I would appreciate if someb

Re: [RFC] User-visible changes for powerpc64-le-linux ABI changes

2021-11-15 Thread Peter Bergner via Fortran
On 11/15/21 2:27 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote: > I am still waiting on a response for the account on the development machine. I haven't heard anything about the P9 partition either. I'll ping OSU about that now. Peter

[PATCH] PR fortran/99061 - [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_intrinsic_atan2d, at fortran/trans-intrinsic.c:4728

2021-11-15 Thread Harald Anlauf via Fortran
Dear Fortranners, the attached patch fixes the handling of the DEC trigonometric intrinsics for different argument kinds. It is based on the original patch by Steve, which fixes the lookup for the needed intrinsics. Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK for affected branches? Thanks, Harald Fr

Re: [RFC] User-visible changes for powerpc64-le-linux ABI changes

2021-11-15 Thread Thomas Koenig via Fortran
Hi, is there an update on this? I am still waiting on a response for the account on the development machine. I assume we would to the development on a branch. My git fu is extremely weak, so I would appreciate if somebody did that for me. Is it actually possible to implement what I wrote in t

Re: GCC 12.0.0 Status Report (2021-11-15), Stage 3 in effect NOW

2021-11-15 Thread H.J. Lu via Fortran
On Mon, Nov 15, 2021 at 4:05 AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > Status > == > > The GCC development branch now is open for general bugfixing (Stage 3). > > Take the quality data below with a big grain of salt - most of the > new P3 classified bugs will become P1 or P2 (generally ev

GCC 12.0.0 Status Report (2021-11-15), Stage 3 in effect NOW

2021-11-15 Thread Richard Biener via Fortran
Status == The GCC development branch now is open for general bugfixing (Stage 3). Take the quality data below with a big grain of salt - most of the new P3 classified bugs will become P1 or P2 (generally every regression against GCC 11 is to be considered P1 if it concerns primary or second

[patch] Fortran/OpenMP: Support most of 5.1 atomic extensions

2021-11-15 Thread Tobias Burnus
The basic support was lying around here already for too long. TODO at some point: Update the trans-openmp.c part to handle compare + extend the testcases even more, especially when compare works. OK? Tobias - Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201