Indeed, I somehow managed to use the wrong of the two enums in the cast ...
Fixed in r12-1760-gcac3527793b38164e2a83c7ccbfe0cfcf5ac95b8
On 23.06.21 16:13, Martin Liška wrote:
I noticed the patch causes the following clang warnings:
gcc/fortran/dump-parse-tree.c:1786:11: warning: comparison of
Hi José,
> Thus: Do you have a list of patches pending review?
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055924.html
PRs 100029 and 100040. I have the patch in my working tree
for a long time. It works as expected. OK to commit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/0559
Hello.
I noticed the patch causes the following clang warnings:
gcc/fortran/dump-parse-tree.c:1786:11: warning: comparison of different
enumeration types in switch statement ('enum gfc_omp_defaultmap' and
'gfc_omp_defaultmap_category') [-Wenum-compare-switch]
gcc/fortran/dump-parse-tree.c:1787
On 23.06.21 10:23, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
Will wait two weeks for any errors introduced by this patch before backporting
to gcc-11, ok?
Fine with me.
Thanks again for the patch.
Tobias
-
Mentor Graphics (Deutschland) GmbH, Arnulfstrasse 201, 80634 München
Registergericht
Hi all,
the fix for PR100337 was submitted as da13e4ebebb07a47d5fb50eab8893f8fe38683df.
Thanks for the review Tobias.
@Tobias: You are right, caf_single does not get much testing. But this part
(not providing a stat) is tested multiple times, because of the laziness. Nearly
none of the tests in
