Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/100551 - [11/12 Regression] Passing return value to class(*) dummy argument

Hi Harald, I meant to deal with this myself since I am the guilty party. However, the last two weeks have been taken up by a house move and so gfortran has been on the backburner. The patch looks good and seems to do the job - OK for master and 11-branch. Thanks a million for dealing with it! P

Re: [Ping^2, Patch, Fortran] PR98301 Re: RANDOM_INIT() and coarray Fortran

On 5/23/21 1:59 PM, Andre Vehreschild wrote: Hi Martin, thanks for pointing that out. I haven't committed for quite some time now and could not find on the webpage how this works nowadays. I was thinking that the special gcc-git-command should have added the Changelog entries automagically and i

Re: [Ping^2, Patch, Fortran] PR98301 Re: RANDOM_INIT() and coarray Fortran

Hi Martin, thanks for pointing that out. I haven't committed for quite some time now and could not find on the webpage how this works nowadays. I was thinking that the special gcc-git-command should have added the Changelog entries automagically and immediately. That they are added by a daily bump

[Patch, committed] fortran/intrinsic.texi: Use proper variable name (Re: online doc corr.)

Hi Johannes, hi all, On 22.05.21 23:06, Johannes Nendwich via Gcc wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-11.1.0/gfortran/ATOMIC_005fADD.html#ATOMIC_005fADD "ATOMIC_ADD(ATOM, VALUE) atomically adds the value of VAR to the variable ATOM." --> "... adds the value of VALUE ..." ? Indeed – and t

Re: [Patch] OpenMP/Fortran: Handle polymorphic scalars in data-sharing FIRSTPRIVATE [PR86470]

*PING* (OpenMP patches: I note that the reduction + firstprivate→tofrom patch is still being reviewed and that there are bunch of recently posted patches by ChungLin + Julian which are also pending review.) (There is also one patch (affinity + iterator) I still have to repost – and will happen so