https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954716
Akira TAGOH changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954716
--- Comment #8 from Ben Cotton ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 35 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 35 on
2022-12-13.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954716
--- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
Exactly, it has no business of understanding how font faces are split over
files, it should display one entry per face detected by fontconfig, and let
fontconfig handle the assembling, instead of duplica
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954716
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen ---
> 2. The GNOME font selector is usually more correct, but also suffers from
> attempts to make things up instead of relying on Opentype face names, making
> a mess more often than not (but less often t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954716
Nicolas Mailhot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954716
--- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
Of course some font makers DO expect apps to understand Bold when they use some
other hipster designation. It works in their Apple apps (and they did not test
anything else).
What can I say, you want ap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1954716
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot ---
BTW Bold is not the same as Medium, there is no more reason to expect Medium to
be used when asking a Bold Regular, than expecting Regular to be used when
asking a Bold Light. Since your font family does
