y processed. Can you please
confirm?
Both the ICLA and my email change request reference f...@rduartes.net as
the new reference email address.
Thanks,Rui
+1
I think that we need to facilitate as much as possible content maintenance
on the page and Apache CMS seems a good enough solution for that. In this
particular case I think simple is definitely better.
Rui
From: "Bertrand Delacretaz"
Sent: quarta-fe
In the end, the site is just another part of the project and since the
Apache CMS proposed by Bertrand can be based of SVN content, then adding to
its design would be a matter of patch proposal and voting. Or am I seeing
things wrong?
From: "Jonathan Ca
Hi,
I can safely say that I have a bit of experience using Subversion to manage a
long running project with a big development team across several technologies
and the one thing I'm pretty sure of is that, if not managed correctly from the
onset, Subversion could be a nasty beast to handle.
I'll
aneiro de 2012 10:01
To: f...@rduartes.net, flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: So, what should we do first?
Just to expand on what I said earlier. I am hoping we don't agree on
removing sandbox.
Sandbox is a really important working area for each person. The big thing
is that s
I have mixed feeling about this.
On one hand, there is definitely a point for improving the framework's
modularity and split it in several normal rsl, but from my experience, several
of the users of applications I've built, especially in the corporate/healthcare
area, like to clean browser cach
Point taken and I'm sorry for being one of those people that do it. You're
absolutely right and I'd very gladly +1 on that!
Original Message
> From: "Bertrand Delacretaz"
> Sent: quinta-feira, 5 de Janeiro de 2012 10:28
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: I hate top
+1
> I would suggest making a first Flex release much earlier than that, as
> soon as possible, to get familiar with the Apache release process.
I would go as far as to suggest that the first Apache Flex release should
equivalent in code to the current Adobe Flex 4.6 release. This would
guarant
Hi Randy,
> I think releasing an identical version with the same version number
> will cause confusion. Especially since the signed RSL issue has yet to
> be sorted out. Let version 4.6 belong to Adobe. I would go so far as
> to say to consider resetting the version number because it currently
> s
Hi,
I think this time everything is OK as I've received confirmation on the
receipt of ICLA.
Could you please creat an @apache.org account? My preferred username is
rduartes and I'm one of the initial commiters for the project (listed in
the Flex Proposal page as Rui Silva (rui.silva at alert-
Alex,
> I still hope to make RSLs an unnecessary thing in about two to three
years.
> More on that later after we get a first release out and I get some time
to
> work on it.
You're definitely wetting my appetite! Let's see what you have in store!
Rui
11 matches
Mail list logo
