Re: frameworks code update and a question

2012-01-21 Thread Giorgio Natili
>> >Step one: grab the code and try to follow the readme and see if you can >get >it to build. >Step two: do something :-) We have to try to keep the process as much simple as possible, the community needs to grow up again and with new developers starting using flex the framework can grow quic

Re: frameworks code update and a question

2012-01-20 Thread Michael Schmalle
Quoting Alex Harui : On 1/20/12 2:55 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: Well they just dumped to Flex root into whiteboard/frameworks so having individual users in there is a no-go. That was a good idea, but Carol had already started the commit. So what is the plan working off of that code? Wh

Re: frameworks code update and a question

2012-01-20 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/20/12 2:55 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: > Well they just dumped to Flex root into whiteboard/frameworks so > having individual users in there is a no-go. That was a good idea, but Carol had already started the commit. > > So what is the plan working off of that code? What code is going

Re: frameworks code update and a question

2012-01-20 Thread Omar Gonzalez
Yea it was dumped in whiteboard/frameworks, I think that's fine. But I also think it'd be nice to use whiteboard/frameworks/{committerName} just so we can poke around and check out other peoples framework experiments and know who is leading those experiments. Not a must, but it would be nice. -om

Re: frameworks code update and a question

2012-01-20 Thread Michael Schmalle
Well they just dumped to Flex root into whiteboard/frameworks so having individual users in there is a no-go. So what is the plan working off of that code? What code is going in the trunk, sorry I might have missed this conversation. Mike Quoting Omar Gonzalez : That would be fine, or

Re: frameworks code update and a question

2012-01-20 Thread Omar Gonzalez
> > > That would be fine, or maybe whiteboard/frameworks to make it clearer > that it's for everybody to work with. > > -Bertrand > I like this, we can do whiteboard/frameworks/cframpton... etc, so people can branch and experiment with the framework itself and we can all know those types of frame

Re: frameworks code update and a question

2012-01-20 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Carol Frampton wrote: > I propose the code be put in either: > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/branches/frameworksDrop or.. I think flex/branches should only be used for actual branches created from another part of the svn tree. >    https://s

Re: frameworks code update and a question

2012-01-20 Thread Jeffry Houser
On 1/20/2012 1:39 PM, Carol Frampton wrote: Hi all, https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/branches/frameworksDrop or https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/whiteboard/cframpton My intuition tells me that branches/frameworksDrop is a better choice. -- Jeffry Houser Te

Re: frameworks code update and a question

2012-01-20 Thread Doug Arthur
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Carol Frampton wrote: > I propose the code be put in either: > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/branches/frameworksDrop or >    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/whiteboard/cframpton > > > Would this be desirable? This would be a

frameworks code update and a question

2012-01-20 Thread Carol Frampton
Hi all, Since I am still working on figuring out how to preserve the revision history with all the branching/copying we've done without including any code that Adobe legal hasn't approved, I like to propose that I put the frameworks code in the apache flex repository, in some place other than trun