On 12/5/12 12:04 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> TLF was donated to Apache after that under Apache License.
>
> So the Flex SDK NOTICE file needs to change. Does the reference to TLF here
> need to be removed or changed to state it uses Apache 2.0?
I would remove.
>
> The TLF LICENSE
Hi,
> TLF was donated to Apache after that under Apache License.
So the Flex SDK NOTICE file needs to change. Does the reference to TLF here
need to be removed or changed to state it uses Apache 2.0?
The TLF LICENSE file also includes the MLP license after the Apache license
should this be rem
On 12/5/12 11:30 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the change since the parity release was updated TLF to version 3.0.33
> Which can be found here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/tlf/branches/3.0/textLayout/
>
> The older version of the TLF was licences under MIT
Hi,
One of the change since the parity release was updated TLF to version 3.0.33
Which can be found here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/flex/tlf/branches/3.0/textLayout/
The older version of the TLF was licences under MIT however the new version
seems to be licensed under Apache. I
