scuss with the Infra at
> a better solution for git mirroring ?
>
>
> Fred.
>
> -Message d'origine- From: Carlos Rovira
> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 2:27 PM
>
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Rushing into Git
>
> Yes :), I'm
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> ...Those 46 repos are read only... They do not sync back to the main project.
> I think even our project is listed there...
You are confusing https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf - Git repos
for projects that use Git @asf as their
Nicholas,
That's not true. I'm referring to this URL:
http://flume.apache.org/source.html
We are not listed there. And all projects there has full Git apache support
(read/write)
i.e: Apache Flume -> http://flume.apache.org/source.html
2012/11/22 Nicholas Kwiatkowski
>
> Those 46 repos are
Carlos,
Just a heads up that this week is a major holiday in the USA, so responses
may be slow through next Monday. Many on infra are out of the US.
On Nov 22, 2012 8:27 AM, "Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
> Yes :), I'm right now waiting for some response from the infra team, if
> there's no response I w
Carlos,
Those 46 repos are read only... They do not sync back to the main project.
I think even our project is listed there...
On Nov 22, 2012 5:33 AM, "Carlos Rovira"
wrote:
> Hi Bertrand,
>
> 2012/11/22 Bertrand Delacretaz
> >
> > FWIW, my reservations were based on
> >
> > a) Git support fr
switching, wouldn't it be better to discuss with the Infra at a
better solution for git mirroring ?
Fred.
-Message d'origine-
From: Carlos Rovira
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 2:27 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rushing into Git
Yes :), I'm r
Yes :), I'm right now waiting for some response from the infra team, if
there's no response I will ping back, and continue trying paths until I get
something. As I say, I think it's a matter of be patience and constant, but
not throw the towel.
Hopefully Omar, Om, Jose and others will be pushing t
To be fair, Carlos is working - as hard as the system allows him - to
get this done. Credit where credit is due.
EdB
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Furthermore, I would hardly say that we are about to "rush into this
>> without thinking about the 'in real life
Hi,
> Furthermore, I would hardly say that we are about to "rush into this
> without thinking about the 'in real life' consequences". We voted for this
> on 8/15, that was just over 3 months ago. To say we are rushing through the
> changes is kind of ludicrous.
Yep we voted for it but I have to s
I don't know if it the best of both world as I didn't try everything but
this combination worked pretty well for us.
- Fred.
-Message d'origine-
From: Erik de Bruin
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 11:52 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rushing into G
> transparently.
>
> [1] http://subgit.com/
>
> - Fred.
>
> -Message d'origine- From: Carlos Rovira
> Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 11:32 AM
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Rushing into Git
>
>
> Hi Bertrand,
>
> 2012/
er 22, 2012 11:32 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Rushing into Git
Hi Bertrand,
2012/11/22 Bertrand Delacretaz
FWIW, my reservations were based on
a) Git support from ASF infra is still experimental and needs
knowledgeable volunteeers (I'd even say Git experts) in the P
Great Omar! ;)
can you please vote the ticket here so we can get as much relevance as
possible to make this happen?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewVoters!default.jspa?id=12617235
Thanks!
Carlos
2012/11/22 Omar Gonzalez
>
> Well Carlos, since you beat me to it and have already su
Hi Bertrand,
2012/11/22 Bertrand Delacretaz
>
> FWIW, my reservations were based on
>
> a) Git support from ASF infra is still experimental and needs
> knowledgeable volunteeers (I'd even say Git experts) in the PMC to
> work.
>
I count 46 projects on GIT (see https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos
Ok, I thought it could entail less work for infra, but if it's the opposite
it's clear that it's not recomendable. I just delete my comment in the
ticket about the graduation.
2012/11/22 Bertrand Delacretaz
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Erik de Bruin
> wrote:
> >> communitcation to give
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> ...Also of note is
> that ALL THREE of the mentors thought it wisest to stay with SVN (for
> now)
FWIW, my reservations were based on
a) Git support from ASF infra is still experimental and needs
knowledgeable volunteeers (I'd even say
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>> communitcation to give us feedback of the next steps. We should have into
>> account that we have a move out of incubation and that should be a great
>> point in time to make the switch.
>
> In my opinion combining the two moves would be, e
Well, there are a 'few' things the project and it's contributors need
to do themselves after graduation:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#project-first-steps
EdB
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Omar Gonzalez
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> > communitcation to give us feedback of the next steps. We should have into
> > account that we have a move out of incubation and that should be a great
> > point in time to make the switch.
>
> In my opinion combining the two moves would be
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:00 AM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> let's see how infra respond to the ticket generated
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5549 (Please all vote to make
> it happen)
>
> Sincerily, this migration should be supported by
> communitcation to give us feedback of the next steps. We should have into
> account that we have a move out of incubation and that should be a great
> point in time to make the switch.
In my opinion combining the two moves would be, euphemistically
speaking, a sub-optimal course of action.
EdB
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> I'm not convinced at all this will work out well for the project, with
> the graduation coming up soon (which will mean moving and changing a
> lot of stuff in SVN and elsewhere) and all. But I'll shut up about
> this (for now).
>
Like I s
Hi Erik,
let's see how infra respond to the ticket generated
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5549 (Please all vote to make
it happen)
Sincerily, this migration should be supported by Apache since is what
people in this project wants and infra is about to ease things to make code
flow
I'm not convinced at all this will work out well for the project, with
the graduation coming up soon (which will mean moving and changing a
lot of stuff in SVN and elsewhere) and all. But I'll shut up about
this (for now).
Maybe you can do me (and other doubters and SVN aficionados) and write
up t
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Omar,
>
> >> From the threads here and on the private list I get the feeling that
> >> at least one of our mentors has reservations about the legal standing
> >> of Git repos in relation to Apache.org.
> >
> >
> > Those concerns have been e
Omar,
>> From the threads here and on the private list I get the feeling that
>> at least one of our mentors has reservations about the legal standing
>> of Git repos in relation to Apache.org.
>
>
> Those concerns have been expressed before, during, and after the vote. It
> obviously did not dete
On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Omar,
>
> As a PPMC member I'm aware that this isn't a vote. My full statement
> ended "at this time" and I was using -1 as an abbreviation to
> emphasise my opinion.
>
> From the threads here and on the private list I get the feeling that
> a
Omar,
As a PPMC member I'm aware that this isn't a vote. My full statement
ended "at this time" and I was using -1 as an abbreviation to
emphasise my opinion.
>From the threads here and on the private list I get the feeling that
at least one of our mentors has reservations about the legal standin
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At least one vital service (the website) is more than just a SVN repo.
> A post-commit hook activates the 'buildbot' on every commit. How will
> this be 'translated' when the Git move happens? Do we have access to
> the buildbot outsi
On Wednesday, November 21, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At least one vital service (the website) is more than just a SVN repo.
> A post-commit hook activates the 'buildbot' on every commit. How will
> this be 'translated' when the Git move happens? Do we have access to
> the buildbot outsi
Hi,
At least one vital service (the website) is more than just a SVN repo.
A post-commit hook activates the 'buildbot' on every commit. How will
this be 'translated' when the Git move happens? Do we have access to
the buildbot outside the SVN infrastructure?
Do we know which other services (commi
31 matches
Mail list logo
