I guess I'll have to chime in here then :)
Right now I think having AOP as a framework feature is the most realistic,
once Falcon fully drops
we might start to see compile-time weaving, but for run-time dynamic
proxies it might be an idea to
make it a framework feature.
I am the author of as3common
>>AOP is probably a language thing, which we do not have control of.
Fair point Alex, AOP probably would better be a language feature rather
than a framework feature. Though we might see something sooner if we
implement it as a framework feature.
Having said that if enough f the micro-architecture
On 1/9/12 12:15 PM, "Doug McCune" wrote:
>
> Alex, does the Apache style of individual user contributions lend itself
> better to flushing this out? This is clearly something you've been working
> on at Adobe, but does the fact that Flex is now an Apache project and you
> are acting as an ind
>
> My current thoughts are to create a framework that is very granular and
> uses
> lots of composition. I have prototypes where HelloWorld is a 28K swf.
Alex, does the Apache style of individual user contributions lend itself
better to flushing this out? This is clearly something you've been w
On 1/9/12 10:31 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
> Alex, can you say what your framework classes are based on? Is this
> something where mobile and multi-touch can be used/composed but the
> framework not dependent on them?
My current thoughts are to create a framework that is very granular and
Quoting Alex Harui :
On 1/9/12 8:15 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
* Dinamic View States
...We need the capability to create states on the fly and let
other parts handle this dinamic view states (transitions,...). Without
this, view states are a bit limited.
Adobe has some work in this area
On 1/9/12 8:45 AM, "Jonathan Campos" wrote:
> I agree that "dynamic view states" isn't exactly clear to me.
This is probably just MXML/AS equivalence. Can you do everything in AS that
you can do in MXML. It is not quite possible or very hard for states and
transitions today.
> I could see
On 1/9/12 8:15 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
> * Dinamic View States
>
> ...We need the capability to create states on the fly and let
> other parts handle this dinamic view states (transitions,...). Without
> this, view states are a bit limited.
>
Adobe has some work in this area that will lik
+1 to the AOP idea
On 9 January 2012 17:06, Jonathan Campos wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Michael Schmalle >wrote:
>
> > I agree to, something that would deprecate the;
>
>
> It will probably be something I will focus on. So I can get ride of:
>
>
>
>
>
> . . .
>
> And all the o
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> I agree to, something that would deprecate the;
It will probably be something I will focus on. So I can get ride of:
. . .
And all the other code required to make that work.
--
Jonathan Campos
Quoting Jonathan Campos :
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
Do you have a use case for dynamic view states? I can honestly say I've
never been limited by the current implementation.
I agree that "dynamic view states" isn't exactly clear to me. I could see a
need to off
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> Do you have a use case for dynamic view states? I can honestly say I've
> never been limited by the current implementation.
I agree that "dynamic view states" isn't exactly clear to me. I could see a
need to official support for "multi-di
Sorry, in my last email I deleted accidentally the first part:
On 09-01-2012 16:37, Nick Collins wrote:
Out of curiosity, what Maven support are you looking for that Flex-Mojos
doesn't provide, other than being natively integrated into the compiler,
perhaps?
- public repositories for the SDK
Do you have a use case for dynamic view states? I can honestly say
I've never been limited by the current implementation.
In the Flex 3 era you could define states on the fly; but it could be
a pain. I have never dug into the underpinnings of the Spark State
system, though.
On 1/9/2012
- public repositories for the SDK and other components
- plugin to generate flash builder / flashdevelop / FDT / etc project files
- Marvin Froeder subscribed here on the Flex mailing list :o)
João Saleiro
Out of curiosity, what Maven support are you looking for that Flex-Mojos
doesn't provide, other than being natively integrated into the compiler,
perhaps?
Nick Collins
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would want to share my though
16 matches
Mail list logo
