Hi,
I knew very well, this is not a place for HTML. That's why i
clearly said "Please don't reply with any HTML codes". I just tried to
say how Flex is good when compare with HTML in lay-outing.
What i did wrong is instead of posting this in flex-users list, i posted
it in flex-dev. I don'
You can't tell stories at work? I think some of us would say it is related.
It's motivation. And with all the delays it can be easy to forget why we're
all here.
Besides that, it's interesting. I like these discussions because it shows
the pros and cons of what's out there and what we can learn fr
+1 (non-binding) Doug
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Doug McCune wrote:
>>
>> I agree there is benefit to debating various options and alternatives. I
>> disagree that this list is the place for such discussions, as such
>> discussions are unrelated to the development of the Flex SDK.
>>
>
>
On 6/15/2012 2:28 PM, Doug McCune wrote:
I agree there is benefit to debating various options and alternatives. I
disagree that this list is the place for such discussions, as such
discussions are unrelated to the development of the Flex SDK.
I guess my concern is that the people contributing
>
> I agree there is benefit to debating various options and alternatives. I
> disagree that this list is the place for such discussions, as such
> discussions are unrelated to the development of the Flex SDK.
>
I guess my concern is that the people contributing to the Flex SDK will
essentially p
On 6/15/2012 12:12 PM, Doug McCune wrote:
Your experiences / pains on building HTML apps has no place here. Nor
does a debate on the merits of HTML/JavaScript Frameworks.
I've said it before and I'll repeat it again. This is so very not true. As
a community, as a project, as a technology, Flex
Hi Rick,
I was merely mentioning Flex vs HTML as the undertone of the original
message. The various technologies should indeed be discussed and considered
together, preferably on a separate list if not directly related to the
development of the Flex SDK itself.
regards,
Christophe
2012/6/15 Rick
Christophe - what of Falcon and the onus it places on the future of the Flex
SDK? This is not a story of HTML vs Flex... it's about their interdependency
and maturity. I don't think that it would be wise to conceptually place these
two technologies into separate buckets at this point. Just sayin
And we might learn things that help us develop Apache Flex to be even
better.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Rick Winscot wrote:
> Doug's comments are well said... discussing the pain-points in a competing
> technology is a healthy exercise.
>
> On Friday, June 15, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Doug McCune
If you really think about it, the post was tongue in cheek, meant to spur
passion and action amongst exactly the group of people who are on this list,
people who can save this and other poor fellows from a treacherous HTML
existence. It was meant to be inspirational.
Ariel Jakobovits
arielj...
Doug's comments are well said... discussing the pain-points in a competing
technology is a healthy exercise.
On Friday, June 15, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Doug McCune wrote:
> >
> > Your experiences / pains on building HTML apps has no place here. Nor
> > does a debate on the merits of HTML/JavaScript
I agree that we should not silence people that want to discuss HTML vs Flex
as we can only benefit from these discussions. However, this is the
flex-dev list, intended for people who are actively working on the Flex SDK
code. I would encourage everyone to check the flex-users list for
discussions l
>
> Your experiences / pains on building HTML apps has no place here. Nor
> does a debate on the merits of HTML/JavaScript Frameworks.
I've said it before and I'll repeat it again. This is so very not true. As
a community, as a project, as a technology, Flex absolutely is fighting
tooth and nail
+1 on Jeffry's remark, and sorry to add to the noise.
- Peter
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
> I don't believe I was being unfriendly. This is mailing list explicitly
> related to building the Apache Flex SDK. Your experiences / pains on
> building HTML apps has no p
I don't believe I was being unfriendly. This is mailing list
explicitly related to building the Apache Flex SDK. Your experiences /
pains on building HTML apps has no place here. Nor does a debate on the
merits of HTML/JavaScript Frameworks.
I'm not saying discussions on HTML or related
Try twitters bootstrap...pretty nice.
http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap
On Jun 15, 2012 10:01 AM, "Joan Llenas Masó" wrote:
> You are right, HTML layout is painful ( not sure if HTML5 improved the box
> model in any way )
> Onde I needed a consistent grid layout system, nestable up to a few le
I don't see this mail so Off Topic that I would send someone elsewhere...
Don't be so unfriendly please.. (With all due respects)
--
Joan Llenas Masó
CTO Garnet Works SL
T. 93 848 57 27
--
@joangarnet (es)
@joanllenas (en)
http://joan.garnet.io
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Jeffry Houser w
To make the layout in HTML as easy as in Flex, you can use a
responsive grid http://960.gs
--
Mansour Blanco
Software engineer
Stackoverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/users/612920/mansuro
Blog: zuro.blogspot.com
github: https://github.com/Mansuro
With all due respects; we're glad you like Flex and some of it's
simplicity; but as this conversation has nothing to do with development
of Flex SDK; can you please take it elsewhere?
On 6/15/2012 9:50 AM, James Ong wrote:
Hundreds libraries? Just JQuery and any solid JS framework will do. I
You are right, HTML layout is painful ( not sure if HTML5 improved the box
model in any way )
Onde I needed a consistent grid layout system, nestable up to a few levels
deep and ended up using blueprintcss http://blueprintcss.org/ and
generating a huge CSS for all kinds of combinations.
It worked
Hundreds libraries? Just JQuery and any solid JS framework will do. I been
using Flex, Scala (Play! or Lift framework) and PHP/Javascript/CSS for
years. You will need to understand Flex is not one-size-fit-all technology
and slowly you should get used to it.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:40 PM, sathy
21 matches
Mail list logo
