Thanks for clarifications.
Regards,
--
Abdul Sattar
(Director IT & Operations)
0321-6433805
www.powersoft.com.pk
Sorry for double post. Just to better illustrate the case, there's this
famous story about Churchill:
During the Second World War, Winston Churchill’s finance minister said
Britain should cut arts funding to support the war effort. Churchill’s
response: “Then what are we fighting for?”
Same with
Abdul, you probably didn't understand my comment. AIR developers are people
developing AIR runtime, not people using it (developing for AIR).
In other words: there is zero gain for me (as someone who would want to
develop for AIR for Linux), because it doesn't run there, unless Linux
mimics Window
On 22 March 2012 20:42, Left Right wrote:
> > Adobe AIR 3 apps on linux run pretty good under Wine 1.4. :)
> >
> > This is kind of Hobson's choice... I don't see how it makes it better,
> neither for me, nor for the AIR developers...
>
> Its nice to know - but I have to agree with Oleg - never re
> Adobe AIR 3 apps on linux run pretty good under Wine 1.4. :)
>
> This is kind of Hobson's choice... I don't see how it makes it better,
neither for me, nor for the AIR developers...
Best.
Oleg
On 3/21/12 11:24 AM, "olegsivo...@gmail.com" wrote:
> I'm with Spolsky on this one: I.e. I think it's too tedious to re-read the
> entire conversation preceding this message in every message, but I didn't
> know there are such rules. I'm sorry if I violated them.
You are a smart enough guy to
I'm with Spolsky on this one: I.e. I think it's too tedious to re-read the
entire conversation preceding this message in every message, but I didn't
know there are such rules. I'm sorry if I violated them.
AIR on Linux is no longer supported, but it has never existed for amd64
architecture. The on
Oleg, you have a reputation for writing verbosely and writing often. Please
respect the Apache protocol of leaving snippets of what you are replying to.
On 3/21/12 10:15 AM, "olegsivo...@gmail.com" wrote:
> I didn't like it - that's true, besides, I can't even use it, since there's
> no AIR fo
I didn't like it - that's true, besides, I can't even use it, since there's
no AIR for Linux, so, even if it got improved, I won't probably discover
that... :) However, it depends on the help materials to be generated in a
certain way, so that's a dependency. Imagine, once we have Flex
documentatio
On 3/21/12 1:09 AM, "olegsivo...@gmail.com" wrote:
> When I was talking about an "AIR help application" I meant this:
> http://www.adobe.com/support/chc/ (CHC). I didn't mean it may be donated
> because it is more of the Creative Suite thing then anything specific to
> Flex.
>
That is not on
Hi,
> No-no, you misunderstood me re' MXML language reference. This is what I
> meant: http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/MXML+2009.
I'm sure we can ask for this to be donated and then update/modify as required.
Adobe have stated support Flex for a minimum of 5 years so these pages
Hi,
> Well, the docs are not distributed as binaries, you need to compile them
And currently neither are the framework swcs you have to compile them yourself
as well. I'm sure first off people will host them somewhere and in the future
Apache will host them. As I said it's early days and the inf
Well, the docs are not distributed as binaries, you need to compile them
(not every one who can read the documentation necessarily knows how to
compile it). You may only want to install (download) documentation, w/o the
entire SDK to things like kindle for example etc.
There are also other documen
Hi,
> Finally, no help is distributed with SDK today. I mean, of course there is
> documentation in the source code and it is available as code hinting by
> using "fat swcs", but there's no separate body of documentation (although,
> there is ASDocs target in the framework builds).
The ASdoc direc
When I was talking about an "AIR help application" I meant this:
http://www.adobe.com/support/chc/ (CHC). I didn't mean it may be donated
because it is more of the Creative Suite thing then anything specific to
Flex.
I was asking these questions rather because: Flex help is used by other
applicati
On 3/20/12 2:59 PM, "olegsivo...@gmail.com" wrote:
> I was wondering, how much and if at all, and if not this list, then who is
> responsible for the documentation pages.
Apache Flex is only responsible for documentation of classes in its
repository. If you want to offer to maintain a documen
Hi,
The Spoon project is looking into doing some work around documentation but in
general we all are responsible for the documentation.
> - if I find documentation related bugs, who do I tell about it?
Tell the list and/or raise a JIRA issue and if you can provide a patch.
Most of the documenta
17 matches
Mail list logo
