On 11/15/2012 4:23 AM, Maxime Cowez wrote:
What I do not like about the way you're setting this up, is that initial
development will happen behind closed doors (at least that's how I
understand it). So here's a question: would you consider open-sourcing your
development effort right from the star
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> ...I think people should be able to write some
> amount code without having to expose it to the list. But if Jeffry wants to
> save the work in progress on his whiteboard as a backup, that would be one
> way to share...
IMO, evolving code here
On 11/15/12 1:23 AM, "Maxime Cowez" wrote:
> @Jeffry Please don't get me wrong: I very much appreciate the fact that
> your approach is a pragmatic way to get things done quickly. I absolutely
> agree there should be less chatter and more coding. The issue is I don't
> have time to finish my o
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> ...My mental model of the rules say that if a corporation owns a copyright, we
> need a CCLA covering the contributor and donations should have a software
> grant. But what about LLCs? Especially one-person LLCs?...
Whoever commits code
@Jeffry Please don't get me wrong: I very much appreciate the fact that
your approach is a pragmatic way to get things done quickly. I absolutely
agree there should be less chatter and more coding. The issue is I don't
have time to finish my own implementation and make it completely compliant
with
On 11/14/2012 2:17 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
Hi Mentors,
My mental model of the rules say that if a corporation owns a copyright, we
need a CCLA covering the contributor and
DotComIt already has a CCLA filed with Apache. It was filed the same
time I filed my Individual CLA.
So the only remainin
Hi Mentors,
My mental model of the rules say that if a corporation owns a copyright, we
need a CCLA covering the contributor and donations should have a software
grant. But what about LLCs? Especially one-person LLCs?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 11/14/12 11:00 AM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote:
> On 11/14/2012
On 11/14/12 11:00 AM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote:
> On 11/14/2012 1:02 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>> @Jeffry, If someone hooked up the autocomplete logic to a proprietary
>> natural language processing library, that would probably be a problem, but I
>> doubt that will be the case.
>
> AutoComplete f
On 11/14/2012 1:02 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
@Jeffry, If someone hooked up the autocomplete logic to a proprietary
natural language processing library, that would probably be a problem, but I
doubt that will be the case.
AutoComplete functionality is currently exposed via a filterFunction
propert
Most of the work I have been putting into Apache, I've been paid for.
That's why both I and my employer signed the CCLA. This was not
work-for-hire, rather it was the expectation that the work was donated to
Apache. This is no different than what Jeffery is doing.
As far as setting up a standar
If you're concerned about this initiative... please re-read this line in the
story.
"I am using this Kickstarter as a different approach to fund some of my own
Apache Flex development time. This will allow developers with limited free
time to give a small amount of money to help Apache Flex."
On 11/14/12 9:30 AM, "Omar Gonzalez" wrote:
> I've kept quiet about this initiative until now, but, what seems odd to me
> is the idea of someone trying to profit off of developing a component, in
> private (I'm assuming commits won't be directly into Apache's repo) and
> then passing it off a
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Maxime Cowez wrote:
> > true, but then I never intended my implementation to be the de facto
> standard and claimed that it would be donated to Apache Flex.
>
I actually agree with you Maxime. You can see from an autocomplete list [1]
that I created a while back
On 11/14/2012 12:06 PM, Maxime Cowez wrote:
> I think it would be great if there were an AutoComplete component built
> into Flex, but I do have some reservations with this approach. The biggest
> issue from my point of view is that one company/person would decide what
> the basic implementation w
I've kept quiet about this initiative until now, but, what seems odd to me
is the idea of someone trying to profit off of developing a component, in
private (I'm assuming commits won't be directly into Apache's repo) and
then passing it off as a contribution to OSS. It just seems odd and
sheisty. A
On 11/14/2012 12:06 PM, Maxime Cowez wrote:
I think it would be great if there were an AutoComplete component
built into Flex, but I do have some reservations with this approach.
The biggest issue from my point of view is that one company/person
would decide what the basic implementation will b
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> For backers; I'll be hosting routine sessions for the purpose of showing
> progress and soliciting feedback.
Just remember that if it doesn't happen on list then it didn't happen.
--
Jonathan Campos
I think it would be great if there were an AutoComplete component built
into Flex, but I do have some reservations with this approach. The biggest
issue from my point of view is that one company/person would decide what
the basic implementation will be, possibly making it harder for us to add
the t
On 11/14/2012 11:43 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
Any commit can be vetoed for technical or legal reasons, but otherwise I
imagine it would be accepted.
I guess that makes sense; I had not considered that. I'd be surprised
if either of those reasons would come into play.
I assume you did get ok's f
On 11/14/12 8:38 AM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote:
>
> Thanks Mark for the plug. I was just about to post my own announcement.
>
> On 11/14/2012 10:41 AM, Jonathan Campos wrote:
>> It just seemed like some of the wording was off.
>> There seemed to be an assumption in the text that whatever was
Thanks Mark for the plug. I was just about to post my own announcement.
On 11/14/2012 10:41 AM, Jonathan Campos wrote:
It just seemed like some of the wording was off.
There seemed to be an assumption in the text that whatever was developed
would be definitely accepted into the Apache Flex pr
On 11/14/12 10 :19AM, "Mark Fuqua" wrote:
>I'm guessing several people will YELL AT ME for posting this.including
>Jeffry Houser (please forgive the OT post), but there is a Apache Flex
I'm not going to YELL but I think you already know this isn't the
appropriate place to post what is essentia
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Mark Fuqua wrote:
> It would be nice if this first attempt were successful.
I did see the post yesterday and have kept my mouth shut because I did see
an issue with it. Not with the idea, if you want to raise money to fund
development that is great. It just seem
23 matches
Mail list logo
