Om,
Don't forget to update the RC6 tag with your changes.
Carol
On 10/9/12 7 :59PM, "Om" wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/9/12 5 :19PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On 10/9/12 2:01 PM, "Om" wrote:
>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> The licen
Om,
>From trunk, it looks great in my eyes (although my eyes glaze over on the
details of the licensing stuff). I'm excited for it :)
-Nick
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Om wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 10/9/12 5 :19PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
>
>
> On 10/9/12 5 :19PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >On 10/9/12 2:01 PM, "Om" wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The license agreement ui feels unnatural to me but it's ok for now.
> >>>The
> >>> red boxes on the left look like checkboxe
On 10/9/12 5 :19PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
>On 10/9/12 2:01 PM, "Om" wrote:
>
>>>
>>>
>>> The license agreement ui feels unnatural to me but it's ok for now.
>>>The
>>> red boxes on the left look like checkboxes to me and it always takes me
>>> awhile to remember I can't click them but ha
On 10/9/12 2:01 PM, "Om" wrote:
>>
>>
>> The license agreement ui feels unnatural to me but it's ok for now. The
>> red boxes on the left look like checkboxes to me and it always takes me
>> awhile to remember I can't click them but have to check the "I Agree,
>> Install" box at the bottom
>
>
> The license agreement ui feels unnatural to me but it's ok for now. The
> red boxes on the left look like checkboxes to me and it always takes me
> awhile to remember I can't click them but have to check the "I Agree,
> Install" box at the bottom. I click on a component, read the license,
Om,
The RC6 tag is now old as I discovered.
I think the license text changes look ok. The SwfObject component in the
list should be SWFObject since that is it's name and that is what is in
the license text.
The license agreement ui feels unnatural to me but it's ok for now. The
red boxes on t
On 10/8/12 2:49 PM, "Om" wrote:
>
> Sounds good to me. Fixed in trunk.
>
OK, I am happy with that screen. I am now running the rest of the installer
just in case, which will take a while.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/8/12 2:18 PM, "Om" wrote:
>
>
> >>
> > I am more inclined towards rewording the blurb. Apache Flex SDK is one
> of
> > the components we are installing and it makes sense to prompt users to
> > explicitly agree to the Apache licens
On 10/8/12 2:18 PM, "Om" wrote:
>>
> I am more inclined towards rewording the blurb. Apache Flex SDK is one of
> the components we are installing and it makes sense to prompt users to
> explicitly agree to the Apache license. I dont see it being any different
> than the other components we
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi Om,
>
> Thanks for putting in all this work. I built the trunk and ran the DMG. I
> have a few comments:
>
> When you first get to the licensing screen, it says:
>
> "These components have license agreements other than Apache License V2."
>
Hi Om,
Thanks for putting in all this work. I built the trunk and ran the DMG. I
have a few comments:
When you first get to the licensing screen, it says:
"These components have license agreements other than Apache License V2."
But the very first thing in the list on the left is "Apache Flex
bump...
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Om wrote:
> Team,
>
> I have updated the InstallApacheFlex app to include the license text and
> urls for each of the installed components. I am also enforcing that the
> user explicitly agree to all the licenses before proceeding to
> installation.
>
> T
13 matches
Mail list logo
