That's a lot of good information to start with!
Thanks a lot.
Personally, after reading Alex thoughts about the Flex rewrite and watching
Michael Labriola Randori slides I see a future for current work done.
I am very enthusiastic about this new vision and I'll try to give arguments
in its favour
One other thing, I know I have siad this before but I have about 2
years of work with AS3 and Java parsers/AST from the following
projects of mine;
see; [0]
- AS3 ANTLR implementation of an AS3 DOM.
see; [1]
- Java ANTLR implementation of an AS3 DOM
They aren't perfect projects(The AS3 la
Quoting Joan Llenas Masó :
Michael, (nothing to do with last discussion).
It's obvious that you have knowledge about the compiler so let me ask you
some things...
Aside from what's here (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Falcon+Overview ) what
would you recommend to someone who i
Michael, (nothing to do with last discussion).
It's obvious that you have knowledge about the compiler so let me ask you
some things...
Aside from what's here (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Falcon+Overview ) what
would you recommend to someone who is curious about the compiler
a
I don't quite understand what you are saying but, I have said 100
times I do not like the Flash Player in many threads, read it on my
blog etc.
What I said below means, I would bet on AS3 language for the time
being NOT the SWF format. The compilers are lexers/parsers first and
parse AS3,
I think a little differently, the only answer we have now is that we move
from dependence on runtime from Adobe. This lack of information and
changing business plans involving the VM is terrible for the future of
Apache Flex.
Or are we an independent solution for RIA development, or we will live
f
> The last two days proves that know one has any real answers to anything right
> now. The only way to get answers is the scientific method of limit your
> variables and test the crap out the ideas.
Well said, I totally agree with this :-)
On 17.11.2012, at 19:00, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> Bef
Before I commit to anything that is in Haxe land or total rewriting
etc, I am going to experiment with FalconAS, FalconJS and the MXML
compiler for fun.
To me as you just said, experimenting at the moment with something we
have is going to be an experiment for me. Unless some chariot flies
I understand and I agree. I was just reacting to an email by Gordon
explaining that MXML 'coverage' in Falcon is at 80%, but that the last 20%
will take many man-months to finish, something Gordon on his own is
obviously not capable of contributing. And then there's FalconJS, which
from the few thi
On 11/17/12 4:47 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
> As a complete compiler noob, but can somebody answer this:
>
> Can we not build a 'mxmlcJS'? I understand that Falcon was specifically
> designed to have a 'variable backend' that allows for FalconJS to be hooked
> in. Is something like that feasi
10 matches
Mail list logo
