Ok sorry, i stand correct and was obviously out of line.
Thank you for clearing that up. Next time i'll investigate better before
posting nonsense on the list.
> I think I've explained this on the list already. The Flash Player has
> multiple version numbers, making for a lot of confusion. Th
Re' no change since FP10 in the format - well, that's not precise, the fast
memory access opcodes have changed and since recently are unusable. They
weren't documented, so that's kind of OK, but that doesn't make it easier
for anyone who used them. There were other undocumented tags, something
Flex
On 2/21/12 2:34 PM, "Arnoud Bos" wrote:
>
> Somehow i always find this funny, people saying you can build your own flash
> player because the swf format is open and we have tamarin.
> Where are the official specs of v11-v13 swf format then? Maybe i'm looking in
> the wrong places. But AFAIK t
>Somehow i always find this funny, people saying you can build your own flash
>player because the swf format is open and we have tamarin.
>Where are the official specs of v11-v13 swf format then? Maybe i'm looking in
>the wrong places. But AFAIK they're not publicized by Adobe.
>(at least no one
On Feb 21, 2012, at 9:49 PM, Michael A. Labriola wrote:
>> thanks for the input, let me put it another way. Adobe can change the
>> runtime anytime they want. They have not made the runtime code accessible to
>> the Apache >Flex project. Its within the realm of possibility that they can
>> cha
Hi,
> ... they can change something in the runtime that breaks for example current
> Flex
> 4.6 apps.
But we have access to the Flex SDK code and can change that to match any
changes. It would have to be a fairly major change for us to not be able to fix
it. There is a small risk that it would
>> Arturo Alvarado
> > Yes, and so can Intel decide to make a new processor line that breaks all
> >versions of Windows and MacOS.
> Yes, but you can delay that affecting you by not buying a new computer. I
> still run Windows XP on an old laptop, for example.
> But Adobe can automatically u
PM
Subject: Re: Can Adobe kill Apache Flex
From: "Charles Monteiro"
> thanks for the input, let me put it another way. Adobe can change the
> runtime anytime they want. They have not made the runtime code accessible
> to the Apache Flex project. Its within the realm of poss
got it, and Tamarin interesting prospect, I think I have the sense of what
I need, thanks
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Michael A. Labriola <
labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote:
> >thanks for the input, let me put it another way. Adobe can change the
> runtime anytime they want. They have not
27;s plausible.
- Gordon Smith, Adobe
-Original Message-
From: charles.monte...@gmail.com [mailto:charles.monte...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Charles Monteiro
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 12:26 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can Adobe kill Apache Flex
thanks for the i
>thanks for the input, let me put it another way. Adobe can change the runtime
>anytime they want. They have not made the runtime code accessible to the
>Apache >Flex project. Its within the realm of possibility that they can change
>something in the runtime that breaks for example current Flex
I am not looking for 100% assurances :) , I've been around too long to
fantasize like that. I just know that when I talk to my clients and now
propose Flex that I am armed with enough arguments to convince them that
its a good move given all the bad press Adobe's move seems to have
generated.
than
From: "Charles Monteiro"
> thanks for the input, let me put it another way. Adobe can change the
> runtime anytime they want. They have not made the runtime code accessible
> to the Apache Flex project. Its within the realm of possibility that they
> can change something in the runtime that break
thanks for the input, let me put it another way. Adobe can change the
runtime anytime they want. They have not made the runtime code accessible
to the Apache Flex project. Its within the realm of possibility that they
can change something in the runtime that breaks for example current Flex
4.6 apps
**Sorry all, formatting was messed up on that reply, hoping this one is
better.**
Hi Charles,
Answers integrated below:
>So this is what I mean by the subject line. My understanding is that the Flash
>and Air runtimes have not been open sourced which poses a vulnerability , so I
>think , that
There are plan to compile flex to other runtimes than Flash, compiling
the code to javascript being one of them. So with the new compiler,
flex will survive much longer, and even without that, adobe doesn't
have the intention to kill flex for years to come. Some developers of
the flex SDK are going
Hi Charles,
Answers integrated below:
So this is what I mean by the subject line. My understanding is that the Flash
and Air runtimes have not been open sourced which poses a vulnerability , so I
think , that whatever advancements made to the runtimes by Adobe will be
incompatible with the Apa
17 matches
Mail list logo
