Hi,
> And it does not support pull requests.
Not directly but for a given pull request you can generate a patch file and
apply that to SVN easily enough. Only minor issuer is I'm not sure how you
close the pull request.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33175
Thanks,
Justin
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:13 PM, christofer.d...@c-ware.de <
christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> But in my oppinion the plugin shouln't be part of the SDK as the SDK isn't
> a maven project itself.
> It would be a nightmare to setup a build for all. I would sort of see it
> as a separate project wi
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Dasa Paddock wrote:
> This is the repo that's been getting updates:
> https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk
>
>
You are right. And to be precise, it is the develop branch where stuff
gets checked in: https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk/tree/develop
And it does not su
This is the repo that's been getting updates:
https://github.com/apache/flex-sdk
On Nov 7, 2012, at 3:32 PM, Om wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Eugene Krevenets (aka Hyzhak) <
> hyz...@yandex.com> wrote:
>
>> It's good news. Where you plan to share New Maven Plugin sources? As i
>> men
Yes, it's sounds good. And github pull request can be merged to Apache Flex
Repo?
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Eugene Krevenets (aka Hyzhak) <
hyz...@yandex.com> wrote:
> It's good news. Where you plan to share New Maven Plugin sources? As i
> mentioned before, it's better be a github, because it's easy to pull
> request to it. Thank you for your contribution to community.
>
It's good news. Where you plan to share New Maven Plugin sources? As i
mentioned before, it's better be a github, because it's easy to pull request to
it. Thank you for your contribution to community.
07.11.2012, 20:32, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de" :
> Hi,
>
> as most of you probably know, I'm cu
endet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2012 21:28
> An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: [Discussion] Implementing a dedicated maven-flex-plugin
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I think you are choosing the right path. People using old SDKs could use
> old flexmojos dependency...people using
+1
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Carlos Rovira <
carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I think you are choosing the right path. People using old SDKs could use
> old flexmojos dependency...people using apache flex could use your new
> version. So I think your plan should be ok
Hi Chris,
I think you are choosing the right path. People using old SDKs could use
old flexmojos dependency...people using apache flex could use your new
version. So I think your plan should be ok for all users of Flex.
2012/11/7 christofer.d...@c-ware.de
> Hi,
>
> as most of you probably kn
10 matches
Mail list logo
