>
> mmm, namespaces in interfaces would be a cheap solution to method
> overloading.
>
> v1 function doThis();
> v2 function doThis();
>
> Ugly though...
I agree it could work, but indeed it will lead to some pretty iffy looking
code ;(
mmm, namespaces in interfaces would be a cheap solution to method
overloading.
v1 function doThis();
v2 function doThis();
Ugly though...
--
Joan Llenas Masó
http://joan.garnet.io
@joangarnet (es)
@joanllenas (en)
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 13:19, Martin Heidegger wrote:
> Interfaces descri
Interfaces describe the public access to a class. The "private" or
"protected" namespace are security mechanisms that actually limit the
access for foreign objects.
All properties of a class with a namespace are in fact accessible
public, just the way to address them is different.
Thus it should
>
> > I was just wondering if the restriction that namespaces are not allowed
> > in interfaces is there because the AVM doesn't support it or because the
> > compiler doesn't support it? Might be important as to where the bug
> > should be posted.
>
> Assuming Roland finds that the limitation is w
> From: Martin Heidegger [mailto:m...@leichtgewicht.at]
> Sent: 16 January 2012 09:48
>
> I was just wondering if the restriction that namespaces are not allowed
> in interfaces is there because the AVM doesn't support it or because the
> compiler doesn't support it? Might be important as to whe
On 16 January 2012 10:48, Martin Heidegger wrote:
> I was just wondering if the restriction that namespaces are not allowed in
> interfaces is there because the AVM doesn't support it or because the
> compiler doesn't support it? Might be important as to where the bug should
> be posted.
>
Hm, i
