My most curious finding is that at the HTTPDirectChannel level, the URLRequest
did not permit compilation of the manageCookies property which ultimately
allowed the original headers to pass with no further modifications. Why at
this level does the URLRequest not contain compile when accessing
As far as I know, the limitation of using only GET / POST is from old
netscape plugin api, adobe cannot make more that api gives. Plugin api
does not allow passing something other that GET / POST. In our
application (flex with REST) we used tunneling by using POST with
custom headers, please take a
Oh yeah, i found it.
in the file:
mx.messaging.channels::DirectHTTPChannel.as at line 174:
override protected function internalSend(msgResp:MessageResponder):void
{
var httpMsgResp:DirectHTTPMessageResponder =
DirectHTTPMessageResponder(msgResp);
var urlRequest:URLReque
>I most certainly will, Justin. This has been a dismaying experience to find
>that the flagship service class has such a glaring glitch.
I fear that, when looking deeper, you may find it is the Flash Player and not
the service class that is your root cause, but I would be very happy to be
wron
I most certainly will, Justin. This has been a dismaying experience to find
that the flagship service class has such a glaring glitch.
Hi,
> I have a question. Are there great differences between HTTPService for
> Apache Flex and the code for Adobe SDK 4.6?
There are no differences at the moment. So if you do come up with anything
please share it here.
Thanks,
Justin
No, I'm trying to establish a persistent session login using cookies from an
AIR app to a CakePHP backend. The AsyncToken is because I want to be able to
create a service stack using an object as a hash map which stores the
invocation parameters of the service call in a stack using the tokenID
Hi David,
If this is something to do with file upload, I can help. What exactly are
you trying to do? I've used URLLoader but not with async tokens.
Thanks
Avinash Y
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:17 PM, David Coleman <
david_coleman_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> I have a question. Are
