Hi,
> It will provide a consistent spot for developers to go to for the future.
> Vice once we state there is a new release and they go to the incubation
> page... then in the future we change to the permanent url's.
I believe the old URL will redirect to the new URLs no don't see that as a bi
a new release
and they go to the incubation page... then in the future we change to the
permanent url's.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 13:28
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Next SDK Release Timing
Hi,
On 12/4/12 2:41 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> This sounds reasonable to me. All we need is a volunteer to be the release
>> manager.
>
>
> I'm willing to give it a go. (I have keys for signing the binaries etc etc)
> My time is a little bit limited at the moment so would appreciate
Hi,
> This sounds reasonable to me. All we need is a volunteer to be the release
> manager.
I'm willing to give it a go. (I have keys for signing the binaries etc etc) My
time is a little bit limited at the moment so would appreciate some help.
Thanks,
Justin
This sounds reasonable to me. All we need is a volunteer to be the release
manager. I would rather not be it.
On 12/4/12 12:26 PM, "Greg Reddin" wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>> I¹m leaning towards waiting, but I feel bad for folks who are waiting to
>> see t
> Hi,
> Release early and often should be the case, we are way overdue for a release
> IMO.
> Justin
Justin is correct. Part of the graduation criteria is to be a self-sustaining
community. Concerning ourselves with whether mentors approve or disapprove of
our project provides evidence that we a
On 12/4/12 3 :03PM, "Om" wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Justin Mclean
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > I don't disagree but I think a release without "-incubating" in the
>>title
>> > would be a good thing.
>> Nothing stopping us from making another release after graduation and
>>it's
>> not
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I’m leaning towards waiting, but I feel bad for folks who are waiting to
> see their work get out the door. This will truly separate the Apache Flex
> SDK from the Adobe Flex SDK because non-Adobe code will finally be released!
>
I think we s
Hi,
> I was expecting they would probably just move our existing repository as is
> to an SVN url that is not incubating.
I can't see that should cause too many issues as the release branch we're
working on would also be moved over.
Thanks,
Justin
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I don't disagree but I think a release without "-incubating" in the title
> > would be a good thing.
> Nothing stopping us from making another release after graduation and it's
> not certain that we will graduate at the next board m
Hi,
> I don't disagree but I think a release without "-incubating" in the title
> would be a good thing.
Nothing stopping us from making another release after graduation and it's not
certain that we will graduate at the next board meeting (although I hope we do).
Does anything here need to be up
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Given the pending graduation
> Which we'll find out about 19th Dec at minimum.
>
> > and moving of repositories
> Which as far as I can see still up in the air and there's several
> unanswered questions about and may be at a minimum
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Given the pending graduation
> Which we'll find out about 19th Dec at minimum.
>
> > and moving of repositories
> Which as far as I can see still up in the air and there's several
> unanswered questions about and may be at a minimum
On 12/4/12 2 :32PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Release early and often should be the case, we are way overdue for a
>release IMO.
I don't disagree but I think a release without "-incubating" in the title
would be a good thing. I also don't think we can pull off a release in
the next two w
That said, there is nothing stopping us from preparing for a release before
we graduate. The major difference would be the "incubating" tag for the
release and an additional 72 hour (minimum) voting period in the IPMC. If
folks feel like we can pull it off, they should take it on.
Lets also keep
Hi,
> Given the pending graduation
Which we'll find out about 19th Dec at minimum.
> and moving of repositories
Which as far as I can see still up in the air and there's several unanswered
questions about and may be at a minimum a few months off. (Unless I've missed
some news here)
Do we reall
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Release early and often should be the case, we are way overdue for a
> release IMO.
>
> Justin
While I generally agree with this statement it is predicated on the
assumption that releasing often can happen in an efficient and timely
Hi,
Release early and often should be the case, we are way overdue for a release
IMO.
Justin
I think is better to wait.
just my 2ctns :)
2012/12/4 Jun Heider
>
> On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:27 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> > I’m leaning towards waiting, but I feel bad for folks who are waiting to
> see their work get out the door. This will truly separate the Apache Flex
> SDK from the Adobe Flex
My guess is that it will take at least a month to sort out the code, build,
test and have the artifacts prepared for a release. Also, we want to make
changes to the Installer (ex. removing download of TLF since it is part of
the SDK now)
I think it would be better if we wait instead of trying to
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:27 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I’m leaning towards waiting, but I feel bad for folks who are waiting to see
> their work get out the door. This will truly separate the Apache Flex SDK
> from the Adobe Flex SDK because non-Adobe code will finally be released!
>
> Thoughts?
Go
Hi,
We’ve had a couple of new locales and many bug fixes submitted that have been
sitting around for a while now. It would be great to get them out the door,
but with the impending graduation (we hope), the timing becomes tricky.
I’m not sure we can get it together to get packages approved by
22 matches
Mail list logo
