>
> mmm, namespaces in interfaces would be a cheap solution to method
> overloading.
>
> v1 function doThis();
> v2 function doThis();
>
> Ugly though...
I agree it could work, but indeed it will lead to some pretty iffy looking
code ;(
mmm, namespaces in interfaces would be a cheap solution to method
overloading.
v1 function doThis();
v2 function doThis();
Ugly though...
--
Joan Llenas Masó
http://joan.garnet.io
@joangarnet (es)
@joanllenas (en)
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 13:19, Martin Heidegger wrote:
> Interfaces descri
Interfaces describe the public access to a class. The "private" or
"protected" namespace are security mechanisms that actually limit the
access for foreign objects.
All properties of a class with a namespace are in fact accessible
public, just the way to address them is different.
Thus it should
>
> > I was just wondering if the restriction that namespaces are not allowed
> > in interfaces is there because the AVM doesn't support it or because the
> > compiler doesn't support it? Might be important as to where the bug
> > should be posted.
>
> Assuming Roland finds that the limitation is w
> From: Martin Heidegger [mailto:m...@leichtgewicht.at]
> Sent: 16 January 2012 09:48
>
> I was just wondering if the restriction that namespaces are not allowed
> in interfaces is there because the AVM doesn't support it or because the
> compiler doesn't support it? Might be important as to whe
On 16 January 2012 10:48, Martin Heidegger wrote:
> I was just wondering if the restriction that namespaces are not allowed in
> interfaces is there because the AVM doesn't support it or because the
> compiler doesn't support it? Might be important as to where the bug should
> be posted.
>
Hm, i
I was just wondering if the restriction that namespaces are not allowed
in interfaces is there because the AVM doesn't support it or because the
compiler doesn't support it? Might be important as to where the bug
should be posted.
yours
Martin.
