On 8/27/12 7:35 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> yes, I'm fully synchronized with develop branch.
>
> The differences in number of test reported is already scaring me
> since. I saw this before in other folders and is nothing good...
>
> I think you are ok with getting some method
On 8/27/12 8:25 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
Hi Carlos, thanks for plugging away at this.
> To fill start filling the gaps ;)
>
> ./mini_run.sh tests/browser/
>
> [java] =
> [java] Passes: 0
> [java] Fails: 0
> [java]
To fill start filling the gaps ;)
./mini_run.sh tests/browser/
[java] =
[java] Passes: 0
[java] Fails: 0
[java] =
so all OK (all should be in exclusion)
./mini_run.sh t
Great Peter! this now is more easy to work with! :)
2012/8/27 Peter Ent :
> I've updated the Mustella wiki page and sorted the table (I put in some
> "sub headers" for those test sections that are currently being broken out
> due to their large size - maybe they should get their own table - I migh
I've updated the Mustella wiki page and sorted the table (I put in some
"sub headers" for those test sections that are currently being broken out
due to their large size - maybe they should get their own table - I might
do that later). I culled all the emails and I think I got everything;
please le
Yes, I'm having a great senssation with people supporting the project.
Is great to see it :)
2012/8/27 Peter Ent :
> I'm in the process of gathering all of the info from this weekend. There
> was a lot of activity, which is great to see.
> --peter
>
> On 8/27/12 10:36 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
I'm in the process of gathering all of the info from this weekend. There
was a lot of activity, which is great to see.
--peter
On 8/27/12 10:36 AM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
>Hi Carol,
>
>just Jose told me about that. Yes, it would be helpful.
>
>we need to update it with the latest info from this
Hi Carol,
just Jose told me about that. Yes, it would be helpful.
we need to update it with the latest info from this weekend and point
where we are each one.
Thanks
2012/8/27 Carol Frampton :
> Would it be ok if I alphabetize the Mustella Test Journal section of
> https://cwiki.apache.org/conf
Hi Peter,
yes, I'm fully synchronized with develop branch.
The differences in number of test reported is already scaring me
since. I saw this before in other folders and is nothing good...
I think you are ok with getting some method to work over since I think
the team working right now on this i
That's a good idea. I have it open for edit right now so I'll do that.
--peter
On 8/27/12 10:32 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
>Would it be ok if I alphabetize the Mustella Test Journal section of
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Mustella+Overview rather
>than leave it in chronolo
Would it be ok if I alphabetize the Mustella Test Journal section of
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Mustella+Overview rather
than leave it in chronological order? It is getting hard to tell what has
been done.
Carol
Thanks. So we have two issues.
When I run components/DataGrid, I now consistently get 1293 passes and 0
failures. You are seeing only 873 passes. I wonder what happened to the
other 420 tests? Did you sync with [1]?
We are concerned that images creates on system A will not match on system
B and i
Hi Peter,
./mini_run.sh tests/components/DataGrid/ does not work for me. It
reports 21 failures. Then reruning with -createImages flag it passed:
[java] =
[java] Passes: 873
[java] Fails: 0
[java] ===
I've completed components/DataGrid. I wound up repairing a number of tests due
to changes in (x,y) cursor position and in a couple of cases, the wrong image
asset was being used. If anyone on a Mac could re-test components/DataGrid
after syncing to the development branch, that would be helpful t
14 matches
Mail list logo
