I'll put something together. I'm on a rush job right now but hopefully I
can do it next week. - S.
On 3/26/2012 1:45 AM, Carlos Rovira wrote:
Hi Sandford,
there's some link to see demos or code of waht you are commenting?
Thanks
C.
2012/3/26 Sanford Redlich
Hi Oleg,
I've developed a set
Hi Sandford,
there's some link to see demos or code of waht you are commenting?
Thanks
C.
2012/3/26 Sanford Redlich
> Hi Oleg,
>
> I've developed a set of CSS-styleable base components based on
> SpriteVisualElement that might help this effort. It's based on a demo
> system by Nahuel Faronda.
Hi Oleg,
I've developed a set of CSS-styleable base components based on
SpriteVisualElement that might help this effort. It's based on a demo
system by Nahuel Faronda.
It was intended to speed up Flex mobile apps, which it does, actually.
Would that help?
Cheers,
Sanford
On 3/21/2012 1:
Hi, sorry for the late response. I found the class I was thinking about,
it's spark.core.SpriteVisualElement. It's not as small as I hoped, but it's
way much smaller then UIComponent, and it's possible to use it as a base
class for Flex components, so, it may be a good target for a PoC. It has an
a
I tried once to use some spark components with very reduced functionality
for the purpose of using GFX - that's why I mentioned it. I *hope* that
there may be a way do build a PoC using some Spark interfaces masking
alternative smaller implementations.
However, I fell victim to Ubuntu update %) an
Would seriously love to get started with porting Flex onto Haxe. That is
something I prize most of all the changes.
Flex was known for being the best single RIA tool in the market for a long
time. Now over the past months it is losing its glitter. Perhaps porting it
to Haxe and making it truly cro
It will be ideal if there a way to interface any DLL from as3 code when
cross compile to c or cpp, this will attract developers who are using QT
On Mar 14, 2012 6:42 AM, "Arnoud Bos" wrote:
>
> On Mar 13, 2012, at 10:07 PM, Niel Drummond wrote:
>
> >
> > Regarding Arnoud Bos' suggestion of using
On Mar 13, 2012, at 10:07 PM, Niel Drummond wrote:
>
> Regarding Arnoud Bos' suggestion of using as3hx, this might be a solution,
> if (and only if) it's desired to keep as3 as-is, but I doubt it will be a
> satisfactory solution, because I suspect eventually flex will want to
> migrate some of
Niel,
I've tried to bootstrap the framework once, but I've reduced it to the
minimum required to support MXML (so no visual components, collections
etc), only bindings + some other stuff I wasn't able to remove. It would be
all in all about 30 classes. So, if you are interested, I could give it a
I think if some work were to go into this, it would be a great primer for
the issues around targeting javascript/HTML regardless of which compiler is
used. Many issues that were raised in the "porting to haxe" threads
revolved around generic issues that would need to be dealt with regardless
of whe
>Hasn't the MXMLC Flex compiler been open source since version 3?
No, not really. If you look at the licenses (which are contradictory in some
cases) the modules directory containing the compiler source *may* have been
Adobe license and not Mozilla so we may not have the right to redistribute.
On 3/13/2012 10:22 AM, James Cowan wrote:
that is a good summary and yes it sounds like a massive amount of work.
I have never seen an open source MXML compiler but I have seen XAML
open source compilers.
Hasn't the MXMLC Flex compiler been open source since version 3?
--
Jeffry Houser
T
that is a good summary and yes it sounds like a massive amount of work.
I have never seen an open source MXML compiler but I have seen XAML open
source compilers.
extras/mxml.xsd seems to have disappeared but this project
(http://code.google.com/p/xsd4mxml/) seems to be useful.
James
On 13
On Mar 13, 2012, at 1:17 PM, James Cowan wrote:
>
> MXML/AS3/Flex are conceptually identical to XAML/C#/WPF. They borrow a lot of
> ideas from previous XML UI technologies.
> MXML/haXe/Flex does sound quite viable.
Sure, it could be done. But i guess someone should be willing to port the
acti
Hi Tink
markmail is not as easy to search as a google group! I read what posts I
could find but it was not clear
whether the only way of interacting with the haXe environment was via a
port of AS3 source to haXe
or whether there was some other approach. I did not see a post from
Nicholas on t
The topic was discussed a little, but it seemed to me that the general
feeling was "as3 is not haxe", and "let's wait and see what adobe
hands us on a plate".
I am definitely interested in such a project, but it's still an idea
that needs some traction in the community, or it will have some
diffic
Hi James
Hope all is well mate.
Try searching the archives as this has been discussed previously on the list
and Nicholas took part in the discussion.
Tink
James Cowan wrote:
>
>MXML/AS3/Flex are conceptually identical to XAML/C#/WPF. They borrow a
>lot of ideas from previous XML UI technol
MXML/AS3/Flex are conceptually identical to XAML/C#/WPF. They borrow a
lot of ideas from previous XML UI technologies.
MXML/haXe/Flex does sound quite viable.
The issue is that both Silverlight and Flash are dieing and haXe
represents a future for Flex because it is clever cross compiler
tech
To be honest: if I would have to write a framework for haXe I would
focus it on other things than I do in AS3.
AS3 is not a perfect language (by a long shot) but in Flex MXML is a key
concept and it does take some time to implement a hxml of
the same logic, same goes for quite a few other aspects
Cowan wrote:
This has probably been discussed before but I was wondering what the
conclusion/response
to the suggestion of linking Haxe with Flex was:
http://ncannasse.fr/blog/open_letter_to_flex_community
Is it actually possible to link Haxe and Flex? This tutorial
(http://haxe.org/doc/flash/fle
On 12/03/2012 21:03, James Cowan wrote:
This has probably been discussed before but I was wondering what the
conclusion/response
to the suggestion of linking Haxe with Flex was:
http://ncannasse.fr/blog/open_letter_to_flex_community
Is it actually possible to link Haxe and Flex? This
is has indeed been discussed, but if I recall correctly there was no
definite answer as to wether we should use Haxe or not.
> Is it actually possible to link Haxe and Flex? This tutorial
> (http://haxe.org/doc/flash/flex) is very out of
> date.
>
> Perhaps if anyone else is int
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:03 PM, James Cowan wrote:
> ...Perhaps if anyone else is interested, they could drop me an email and we
> could have a (skype) chat?...
Feel free to discuss this here, any technical discussions related to
Flex are welcome here, and exposing them might help in getting mor
This has probably been discussed before but I was wondering what the
conclusion/response
to the suggestion of linking Haxe with Flex was:
http://ncannasse.fr/blog/open_letter_to_flex_community
Is it actually possible to link Haxe and Flex? This tutorial
(http://haxe.org/doc/flash/flex) is
24 matches
Mail list logo
