On 12/6/12 10:58 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
>
>
> On 12/6/12 12 :53PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> IMO, not too late to check in the pending fixes.
>>
>> Yep agree. Just need to decide if you check into the release branch (and
>> we merge back into the develop later) OR provi
On 12/6/12 12 :42PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>HI,
>
>> why asdoc is broken.
>
>In ParagraphElement.as there's a getter name the same as the private
>variable, this causes asdoc to fail.
>
>The getter it not actually used anywhere (that I could find) and is in
>the tlf_internal namespace so I thin
d'origine-
From: Michael Schmalle
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 7:54 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Draft release notes for Apache Flex 4.9
Fred,
I know you answered this a couple weeks ago but it's buried. What did
you do to get the mustella to run and not cra
On 12/6/12 12 :53PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> IMO, not too late to check in the pending fixes.
>
>Yep agree. Just need to decide if you check into the release branch (and
>we merge back into the develop later) OR provide patch files to apply to
>the release branch.
I would check into t
ne- From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:16 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Draft release notes for Apache Flex 4.9
Hi,
13 - Apache Flex SDK can can be compiled for any version of the Flash
Player from 10.2 to 11.5
"can can" should be fixed.
s for them).
- Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 5:16 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Draft release notes for Apache Flex 4.9
Hi,
13 - Apache Flex SDK can can be compiled for any version of the Flash
Player from 10.2
On 12/6/12 9:53 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> IMO, not too late to check in the pending fixes.
>
> Yep agree. Just need to decide if you check into the release branch (and we
> merge back into the develop later) OR provide patch files to apply to the
> release branch.
IMO, the only s
Hi,
> IMO, not too late to check in the pending fixes.
Yep agree. Just need to decide if you check into the release branch (and we
merge back into the develop later) OR provide patch files to apply to the
release branch.
Thanks,
Justin
On 12/6/12 9:29 AM, "Carol Frampton" wrote:
> There was almost no notice that a release was going to
> be cut. If I had a day or two notice I would have checked in more of the
> small bug fixes I have pending and maybe looked at that and why asdoc is
> broken.
IMO, not too late to check in th
HI,
> why asdoc is broken.
In ParagraphElement.as there's a getter name the same as the private variable,
this causes asdoc to fail.
The getter it not actually used anywhere (that I could find) and is in the
tlf_internal namespace so I think it would be safe to rename it like so:
From:
tlf_in
Hi,
> It is correct that the SDK can be built with Java7 and you can compile
> mxml files on the command line.
What would you suggest the release note say about this?
> and why asdoc is broken.
I think I've solved that one.
Justin
On 12/6/12 11 :16AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>>> 13 - Apache Flex SDK can can be compiled for any version of the Flash
>>> Player from 10.2 to 11.5
>>
>> "can can" should be fixed. And is this really true? Have all versions
>> been tested?
>
>As far as I'm aware the Mustellla tests ha
Hi,
> BTW most projects include a list of the fixed bugs right in the release
> notes.
I have included a list of some of the bugs I think are of interest. A large
number of JIRA issues are probably not of interest to users of the SDK. A large
number relate to the installer, build scripts, falcon
Hi,
>> 13 - Apache Flex SDK can can be compiled for any version of the Flash
>> Player from 10.2 to 11.5
>
> "can can" should be fixed. And is this really true? Have all versions
> been tested?
As far as I'm aware the Mustellla tests have not been run for each version but
each version has be
Hi,
> "For a full list see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX";
>
> Could this be changed to a link with a filter on that picks out the relevant
> issues?
It could be but it seems that we've not been consistent in tagging JIRA issues
so I'm not sure how much value it is:
https://issue
BTW most projects include a list of the fixed bugs right in the release
notes. Also as part of the release, all those resolved bugs need to be
closed. Ideally they would be verified first. We got away with not doing
that last time but I think it is part of the standard Apache release
process whi
Differences from Apache Flex 4.8.0:
> 13 - Apache Flex SDK can can be compiled for any version of the Flash
>Player from 10.2 to 11.5
"can can" should be fixed. And is this really true? Have all versions
been tested?
> 16 - New version of the TLF (Text Layout Framework), the TLF 3.0.33
>s
"An", forgive my pedantry.
-Ian
-Original Message-
From: Justin Mclean [mailto:justinmcl...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Justin
Mclean
Sent: 05 December 2012 23:29
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Draft release notes for Apache Flex 4.9
Hi,
Feedback welcome:
http://svn.a
Hi,
Ok, I agree with that, I thought to remember it was said like that from
while.
Thank's.
- Fred.
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 2:40 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Draft release notes for Apache Flex 4.9
H
Hi,
> "- the frameworks/textLayout src is not included which means there is not a
> textLayout RSL. We expect this difference to be limited to this release."
>
> can go way because we do have the source for frameworks/projects/textLayout
> now.
Done.
Justin
HI,
> Doest it mean after the release, the develop branch gonna be on 5.0 ?
I'd suggest "4.10.0" - unless i'st a major release with major changes.
Justin
Doest it mean after the release, the develop branch gonna be on 5.0 ?
- Fred
-Message d'origine-
From: Justin Mclean
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 12:29 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Draft release notes for Apache Flex 4.9
Hi,
Feedback welcome:
Hi,
> Is this still true?
>
> - the frameworks/textLayout src is not included which means there is not a
> textLayout RSL. We expect this difference to be limited to this release.
For the parity release yes (and it under the 4.8 heading), we have the source
code for the 4.8 release (noted und
Nice work!
I think this line under "Differences from Adobe Flex 4.6.0:"
"- the frameworks/textLayout src is not included which means there is not a
textLayout RSL. We expect this difference to be limited to this release."
can go way because we do have the source for frameworks/projects/textLayou
Is this still true?
- the frameworks/textLayout src is not included which means there is not a
textLayout RSL. We expect this difference to be limited to this release.
On Dec 5, 2012, at 3:29 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Feedback welcome:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/flex/
Hi,
Feedback welcome:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/flex/sdk/branches/release4.9/RELEASE_NOTES?revision=1417693&view=markup
In particular any import JIRA fixes I've missed?
Does anything need to be done to the installer to update it to show (and
install) 4.9?
Thanks,
Justin
26 matches
Mail list logo
