Adding to Bertrand's comments, there are some of us on the committer's list
that aren't actively committing at the moment, but monitoring things
closely and still very committed. The project is in a pretty unique phase,
and there are certain people that are a good fit for the current set and
volume
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Carol Frampton wrote:
>
> Some time in the not too distant future, before we exit incubation, I have
> heard there is the possibility that original committers who have
> "disappeared" or maybe never appeared will be removed from the committer
> list. I know there
On 8/13/12 11 :49AM, "Guthmann, Scott" wrote:
>> But, you did the right thing by asking your questions so that everyone
>>who wants to become a committer can understand the process a bit better
>>as well. Thanks for your contributions so far, and I expect nothing
>>less from you in the future
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Guthmann, Scott
wrote:
> There are several people who are on the committer list who haven't
> commented,
> haven't contributed via this mailing list, haven't opened or closed a JIRA
> ticket, and
> probably haven't done much in several months for the Apa
> But, you did the right thing by asking your questions so that everyone who
> wants to become a committer can understand the process a bit better as well.
> Thanks for your contributions so far, and I expect nothing less from you in
> the future :-)
I agree with Om - Erik has been doing a good
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Om wrote:
> ...People who consistently contribute and are active on
> the mailing list will not go unnoticed
Note that that requires PPMC members to actively look at who could be
invited as committers - a good time to look at that is when the PPMC
has to writ
Erik,
You have been providing some very good patches and it is not being
ignored. I was in a very similar state as you a few months ago. The PPMC
did not ignore me. Please keep your trust in the PPMC and continue doing
what you are doing. People who consistently contribute and are active on
th
Thank you, Jeff
You've made this a lot clearer for me. I must say I don't agree with
this process at all, but as most often it is probably better to work
from inside the system if you want change it. I'll be a good boy from
now on :-)
On a side note: I don't work on the project because of self in
> As you can see, punctuation makes a world of a difference.
As I thought adding a smiley at the end of a statement did.
I was trying to drop end the argument with a little joke. I guess I
need to work on my "timing"
;-)
Patch Adams (the contributor formerly known as EdB)
--
Ix Multimedia S
On 8/12/2012 11:32 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
I guess in theory you don't know when you're ready to be considered. It is
completely subjective. You have to do enough work for a PPMC member to
notice and/or care. In this case the "work" will most likely be through
submitting patches [or other c
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> > I guess in theory you don't know when you're ready to be considered.
> It is
> > completely subjective. You have to do enough work for a PPMC member to
> > notice and/or care. In this case the "work" will most likely be through
> > sub
> I guess in theory you don't know when you're ready to be considered. It is
> completely subjective. You have to do enough work for a PPMC member to
> notice and/or care. In this case the "work" will most likely be through
> submitting patches [or other code] through JIRA.
Wow. I was just abo
On 8/12/2012 11:02 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
There is no checklist.
There are no guidelines we can provide you.
So, basically, it is an arbitrary process one has no control over and
no insight in with regard to status or progress? I can imagine that
puts off a lot of people who might otherwise h
On 8/12/2012 10:45 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
In all, can someone in the know clarify "who you have to kill to
become a committer"?
It is up to the PPMC.
Yes, that is how it is 'explained' in the documentation. But
explaining WHO decides does not really answer the question: "how do I
know if I'm
On Sunday, August 12, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> > There is no checklist.
> >
> > There are no guidelines we can provide you.
>
> So, basically, it is an arbitrary process one has no control over and
> no insight in with regard to status or progress? I can imagine that
> puts off a lot of people
> There is no checklist.
>
> There are no guidelines we can provide you.
So, basically, it is an arbitrary process one has no control over and
no insight in with regard to status or progress? I can imagine that
puts off a lot of people who might otherwise have made valuable
contributions :-(
> Ju
On Sunday, August 12, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> >> In all, can someone in the know clarify "who you have to kill to
> >> become a committer"?
> >
> > It is up to the PPMC.
>
> Yes, that is how it is 'explained' in the documentation. But
> explaining WHO decides does not really answer the questi
>> In all, can someone in the know clarify "who you have to kill to
>> become a committer"?
>
> It is up to the PPMC.
Yes, that is how it is 'explained' in the documentation. But
explaining WHO decides does not really answer the question: "how do I
know if I'm ready to be considered, and, if not,
On Sunday, August 12, 2012, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> Yes, I do want that, but that's not what this email is about. Well it
> is, but in a roundabout way :-)
>
> All the documentation and comments I could find talk about WHAT you
> have to do, but not HOW MUCH of that 'what'. And nothing tells you ho
Yes, I do want that, but that's not what this email is about. Well it
is, but in a roundabout way :-)
All the documentation and comments I could find talk about WHAT you
have to do, but not HOW MUCH of that 'what'. And nothing tells you how
to go about making your desire to become a committer know
20 matches
Mail list logo
