responses I got from the FB team are inline
On 3/20/12 5 :49PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> 1. FB checks in SDK/frameworks/locale/{locale} directory to find out the
>> relevant rb swcs.
>Can you ask if it checks from a known list of swcs or if it checks any
>swc in the framework/lib dire
Hi,
> 1. FB checks in SDK/frameworks/locale/{locale} directory to find out the
> relevant rb swcs.
Can you ask if it checks from a known list of swcs or if it checks any swc in
the framework/lib directory. (I suspect it's a known list.)
> FB has a list of swcs for various SDKs and it refers to
Justin,
Here is what an engineer from the FlashBuilder team sent me:
1. FB checks in SDK/frameworks/locale/{locale} directory to find out the
relevant rb swcs. Here {locale} represents the FB installation locale and
not the SDK locale.
And if the relevant rb swc is not found in the {locale} folde
Hi,
Two outstanding issues:
1. How does the source attachment get set for a framework swc?
It's shown n Flex Build Path in the Library Path tab when you expand a swc.
It's needed so you can ctrl click on a class name to go to the class.
2. How does FB work out that the ADDocs for a framework sw
Justin,
I'm only sort of up-to-date on this thread. If you tell me what your
exact problem is I can ask Gaurev or the FlexBuilder team how to do
whatever it is that isn't working for you.
Carol
On 3/16/12 12 :08AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Sorted out the issue (the docs directory now ex
Hi,
Sorted out the issue (the docs directory now exists and contains the ADdocs for
the classes in XML format) but the help still doesn't show in FB.
I'm guessing that it's a FB feature and the it knows to look in the _rb.swc
file for the ASdocs for a class in a corresponding .swc file.
Hi,
> Have you tried looking inside the swc with a zip tool, like 7zip?
> Should contain (at a minimum):
> xyz.swf
> catalog.xml
Contains those and the resource files.
> docs
But is missing this so that's probably the issue.
Your help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Justin
"tempdita" is what asdoc tool creates when using keep-xml="true"
skip-xsl="true"
"docs" is where FlashBuilder looks for the documentation within a swc.
Have you tried looking inside the swc with a zip tool, like 7zip?
Should contain (at a minimum):
xyz.swf
catalog.xml
docs
The docs directory (in
Hi,
> You doing this?
> http://gauravj.com/blog/2010/01/creating-swc-files-with-asdoc-comments/
Basically yes.
It's the xxx_rb.swc that is "fat" so I'm not sure how FB works out that it
needs to look into it for classes contained in xxx.swc.
The contents of the temp directory look fine and t
On 14 Mar 2012, at 23:15, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
Unfortunately we haven't donated the asdoc directory yet
That's OK I can use the directory from the OS Adobe SDK. Thanks for
the help.
I've managed to generate a "fat" rb swc. However the help still
doesn't show in FB.
Unless I doing d
Hi,
> Unfortunately we haven't donated the asdoc directory yet
That's OK I can use the directory from the OS Adobe SDK. Thanks for the help.
I've managed to generate a "fat" rb swc. However the help still doesn't show in
FB.
Unless I doing do something wrong (which is quite possible) there must
Hi,
> I'm in agreement with Jonathan here, using just Apache with no component set
> name will give us problems further down the line if we dev a new set of
> comps. So we could use 'a' + 'the first letter of the marketing name', then,
> tag the full name on the end of the URL.
We could end up
I'm in agreement with Jonathan here, using just Apache with no component set
name will give us problems further down the line if we dev a new set of comps.
So we could use 'a' + 'the first letter of the marketing name', then, tag the
full name on the end of the URL.
Tink
Jonathan Campos wro
Unfortunately we haven't donated the asdoc directory yet but I just looked
in the mpl kit which I downloaded awhile ago from the Adobe site and the
asdoc directory appears to be in there. If you take a look at the
build.xml file in the asdoc directory you will find all the path info.
I just updat
My inclination would have been "asf" rather than "a" but I am sure many
others have opinions.
Was thinking about "asf" or "af" myself.
FlexBuilder uses fat swcs which include the Asdocs for that component. I
just realized yesterday that this is something I/we will have to deal with
once we
Hi,
> My inclination would have been "asf" rather than "a" but I am sure many
> others have opinions.
As I'm sure you know what you specify as a namespace prefix is totally up to
each component/application.
I could for example do this:
...
It's more the name space URI that's th
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> > My vote is to keep the spark ns in the 4.x branch and then have a new
> > namespace when we decide to create a new set of components.
> 100% agree with that. Again not suggestion we change existing name space
> just that we add one or two.
Hi,
> My vote is to keep the spark ns in the 4.x branch and then have a new
> namespace when we decide to create a new set of components.
100% agree with that. Again not suggestion we change existing name space just
that we add one or two.
> I do agree with Daniel in that we don't use "apache" o
On 3/14/12 2 :25AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>
>I made a couple of decisions in doing this that will probably generate
>some discussion. The major one being the Apache Flex namespace.
>
>The flex-config.xml file has a new namespace added for Apache Flex:
>
>http://www.apache.org/flex
>a
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:40 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Forgot to say there is an one advantage in having a different name space
> for new stuff in that it tell you straight away that you need to use the
> Apache Flex SDK not the Adobe 4.6 SDK.
My vote is to keep the spark ns in the 4.x branch a
Hi,
>> If someone wants to add an "mx-ish" component, should that go in the
>> mx namespace or the apache namespace?
Forgot to say there is an one advantage in having a different name space for
new stuff in that it tell you straight away that you need to use the Apache
Flex SDK not the Adobe 4.6
Hi,
> Does adding a new apache component namespace paint us into a corner in the
> future as opposed to using something more abstract (halo, spark, etc.)?
I don't think so we can change it at any time and we're a while away from the
first non parity release. I thought I just go ahead and do it to
>
>
> I made a couple of decisions in doing this that will probably generate
> some discussion. The major one being the Apache Flex namespace.
>
> The flex-config.xml file has a new namespace added for Apache Flex:
>
>http://www.apache.org/flex
>apache-manifest.xml
>
>
> This means you w
Hi,
I just checked in (to patches branch) changes to the build script for a new
apache sub project that produces an apache.swc and apache_rb.swc. (Anyone feel
the swc should have a different name?) This gives a clean separation between
the current swc namespaces and the apache one.
This is wer
24 matches
Mail list logo
