Re: AW: AW: AW: Compiler Arguments
Maybe you can guess which version to use from 2 maps I found :
in the FLEXSDK/framework
ristofer.d...@c-ware.de
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 12:15 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: AW: AW: AW: Compiler Arguments
Well having the AirVersion in the air-config.xml would be great :-) I could
then extend the Generator that it looks at that file and if it doesn't find
1732A
- 3.2.0.3958A
Von: Frédéric THOMAS [webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 2. November 2012 11:49
An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Compiler Arguments
It's not difficult to add, maybe only a new property in the build.
ssage d'origine-
From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 11:20 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: AW: AW: Compiler Arguments
Yup ... added a README.txt to the Generator code explaining stuff like that
... I would have prefered to have this information pro
: Frédéric THOMAS [webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 2. November 2012 11:16
An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Compiler Arguments
Ok, I've got it.
Working on the trunk, develop branch or using the
apache-flex-sdk-4.8.0-incubating-bin.zip, folks will have to had it manualy
t
nt: Friday, November 02, 2012 11:02 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: AW: Compiler Arguments
Well as you had a look at the generator ... I have two directories as input
to the generator. One directory containing all Air SDKs and one containing
all Flex SDKs ... first I process all Ai
igine-
From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 9:55 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: AW: Compiler Arguments
Hi Frederic,
which version would be the one you would have liked to see there?
The versions I use are the defaults, you can surely allways overrid
6
An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Compiler Arguments
Hi Chris,
For the 4.8, I use the official 3.1, for the 4.9, I use the 3.1 / 3.4
indifferently but yes, I have to add manualy the corresponding airglobal.swc
if I want to use the generator against it.
-Message d'or
er 02, 2012 9:55 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: AW: Compiler Arguments
Hi Frederic,
which version would be the one you would have liked to see there?
The versions I use are the defaults, you can surely allways override the
versions used by providing a dependendyManagement section to
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 12:23 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Compiler Arguments
Good news, especialy for the themes, I've seen as well from the dump file
you reported that you updated the air version to the one of the sdk, I
reported this change
THOMAS
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 12:23 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Compiler Arguments
Good news, especialy for the themes, I've seen as well from the dump file
you reported that you updated the air version to the one of the sdk, I
reported t
otmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 2. November 2012 00:23
An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Compiler Arguments
Good news, especialy for the themes, I've seen as well from the dump file
you reported that you updated the air version to the one of the sdk, I
reported this ch
ber 01, 2012 11:53 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Compiler Arguments
Well I did a lot of little stuff.
- I re-activated the creation oft he config-zip, but left out the themes
directory
- I finally activated generating the lib-artifacts with their real versions
sprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. November 2012 23:17
An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Compiler Arguments
Chris,
What kind of changes did you do in the generator ? If they are importants, I&#x
: Donnerstag, 1. November 2012 22:54
An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Compiler Arguments
On 11/1/12 2:35 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
> Am I understanding you correctly, that the handling of
> "-compiler.locale" is correct that wa
012 10:35 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: AW: AW: AW: AW: Compiler Arguments
Am I understanding you correctly, that the handling of "-compiler.locale" is
correct that way, but the "-metadata.language" should probably only contain
the first segment (In this case
On 11/1/12 2:35 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
> Am I understanding you correctly, that the handling of "-compiler.locale" is
> correct that way, but the "-metadata.language" should probably only contain
> the first segment (In this case " es_MX")?
> Sounds sensible. Think I'll have a
k I might be able to finish FM6 and the new Flex
FDKs before going zo the Apache Con Europe :-) (See you there?)
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. November 2012 21:57
An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW:
On 11/1/12 1:17 PM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
> Nope,
>
> This would be the case if you wanted to add 3 different locales.
> If you define es_MX,es_ES,en_US this is more a locale-chain (I reverse learned
> this from the unit-test code.
Hmm, is there really a difference from in the SD
nts passed to the compiler in the
execute method of the MxmlcMojo class and didn't see any mention of the
localesRuntimes.
-Message d'origine-
From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 9:17 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: AW: AW: AW: Comp
]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. November 2012 20:43
An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Compiler Arguments
Chris,
The locales shouldn't be express like that from FM4.x ?
es_MX
es_ES
en_US
-Message d'origine-
From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
Sent: Thursday
Chris,
The locales shouldn't be express like that from FM4.x ?
es_MX
es_ES
en_US
-Message d'origine-
From: christofer.d...@c-ware.de
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 8:34 PM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: AW: AW: Compiler Arguments
Hi Alex,
well the g
to:aha...@adobe.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. November 2012 19:39
An: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Compiler Arguments
On 11/1/12 10:33 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
> Well it is used several times ...
>
> -metadata.language=es_MX,es_ES,en_US
> -m
On 11/1/12 10:33 AM, "christofer.d...@c-ware.de"
wrote:
> Well it is used several times ...
>
> -metadata.language=es_MX,es_ES,en_US
> -metadata.language+=en_US
>
> I've never touched that part of Flexmojos code and I just wanted to know what
> those lines should be and what has changed befo
Well it is used several times ...
-metadata.language=es_MX,es_ES,en_US
-metadata.language+=en_US
I've never touched that part of Flexmojos code and I just wanted to know what
those lines should be and what has changed before startig to implement anything.
Chris
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Hi Frederic,
Hmm ... I think I have to have a look how I can activate those
verbose-stacktraces in Flexmojos ;-) ...
But I think the error message is clear:
Flexmojos is generating the following resource chain
-metadata.language=es_MX,es_ES,en_US
And the flex compiler is telling me that I'm pro
26 matches
Mail list logo
