Re: [MENTOR] source package questions

2012-05-31 Thread Left Right
> > Yes, if we have to, we can probably transform these FLAs into AS projects, > but you lose the ability to edit the assets in a tool like Flash Pro later. > > Well, that's the disadvantage of proprietary tools... I can't edit those files anyway. Best. Oleg

Re: [MENTOR] source package questions

2012-05-30 Thread Alex Harui
On 5/30/12 11:47 PM, "olegsivo...@gmail.com" wrote: > Alex, is the FLA File that you mention the one that has icons for > components / default image icon etc? I mean, it doesn't have any code, > right? If so, maybe we could redo it using SWFMill or similar? I kind of > suspected before this ma

Re: [MENTOR] source package questions

2012-05-30 Thread Left Right
Alex, is the FLA File that you mention the one that has icons for components / default image icon etc? I mean, it doesn't have any code, right? If so, maybe we could redo it using SWFMill or similar? I kind of suspected before this may be a problem. Or, if not SWFMill, we could then have it as a SW

Re: [MENTOR] source package questions

2012-05-30 Thread Carol Frampton
On 5/30/12 6 :19PM, "Greg Reddin" wrote: >On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Carol Frampton >wrote: >> Does this mean that we can include the apache jars that we use in our >>source package? How about in our binary package? > >My preference would be that these files are downloaded as part of th

Re: [MENTOR] source package questions

2012-05-30 Thread Alex Harui
On 5/30/12 3:32 PM, "Om" wrote: >> >> 3. If you have a .fla file which is a source file for Adobe Flash >> Professional does that mean we have to require Adobe Flash Professional as >> a prerequisite build tool? We have other similar situations which involve >> different apps/tools to produ

Re: [MENTOR] source package questions

2012-05-30 Thread Om
> > 3. If you have a .fla file which is a source file for Adobe Flash > Professional does that mean we have to require Adobe Flash Professional as > a prerequisite build tool? We have other similar situations which involve > different apps/tools to produce different assets. > > Is Flash Pro requi

Re: [MENTOR] source package questions

2012-05-30 Thread Greg Reddin
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Carol Frampton wrote: > Does this mean that we can include the apache jars that we use in our source > package?  How about in our binary package? My preference would be that these files are downloaded as part of the build process. Looking at the list, I'm not sur

[MENTOR] source package questions

2012-05-30 Thread Carol Frampton
Mentors, As we attempt to lock down and actually arrive at a realistic release candidate we keep bumping into the "what is source" since we all know that the official Apache release for a product consists of only source code. From: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html The Apache Software Fou