On 3/23/12 7:18 AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
>> ...We have a list of third-party libraries. As far as I can tell the last
>> two in the list might be okay but the rest are not
>>
>> playerglobal.swc - Adobe - this is
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> ...This is what I see in the LICENSE file from the download of
> javacc-5.0.tar.gz. Is this a BSD license?..
Yes, AFAICS that's the 3-clause license as shown at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses
-Bertrand
>
> Copyright (c) 2006
On 3/23/12 10 :18AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
>
>> javacc (Sun) - parser generator used by the compiler
>
>I just downloaded 5.0 from http://javacc.java.net/, that's BSD which is
>ok.
>Older versions might be different IIRC.
This is what I see in the LICENSE file from the download of
javac
I'm absolutely not an expert in this field, but here's what I was thinking
(sorry, if it doesn't make sense): What if it was possible to distribute
SDK and the framework as two separate packages? That would spare the
trouble of OSMF and TLF inclusion for the base (SDK) package? Additionally,
there'
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> ...We have a list of third-party libraries. As far as I can tell the last
> two in the list might be okay but the rest are not
>
> playerglobal.swc - Adobe - this is Flash
> airglobal.swc - Adobe - this is AIR
> OSMF (Open Source M
On 3/23/12 6 :05AM, "Martin Heidegger" wrote:
>On 23/03/2012 06:50, Carol Frampton wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Traditionally the Flex SDK has been distributed as a zip file which
>>contains both the source and the binaries.
>>
>> I read that every ASF release must contain a source package, which must
>
On 3/23/12 5 :38AM, "Bertrand Delacretaz" wrote:
>Hi Carol,
>
>On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Carol Frampton
>wrote:
>> ...I read that every ASF release must contain a source package, which
>>must be sufficient for a
>> user to build and test the release provided they have access to the
>>a
On 23/03/2012 06:50, Carol Frampton wrote:
Hi,
Traditionally the Flex SDK has been distributed as a zip file which contains
both the source and the binaries.
I read that every ASF release must contain a source package, which must be
sufficient for a user to build and test the release provided
Hi Carol,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> ...I read that every ASF release must contain a source package, which must be
> sufficient for a
> user to build and test the release provided they have access to the
> appropriate platform and tools
> and that Apache allows a
Hi,
Traditionally the Flex SDK has been distributed as a zip file which contains
both the source and the binaries.
I read that every ASF release must contain a source package, which must be
sufficient for a user to build and test the release provided they have access
to the appropriate platfor
10 matches
Mail list logo
