On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Om wrote:
> ...Dave,
>
> Did you get a chance to look at RC9? Greg and Bertrand have voted +1. If
> you can vote as soon as possible, it would be great.
> Alternatively, I can send out to general.incubator.a.o where you can vote.
> Please advice how we can move
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Oct 19, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Om wrote:
>
> > Mentors,
> >
> > As you have seen in the vote thread, we need 2 IPMC votes for the RC7 to
> be
> > released. We have plenty of +1 votes and I think that this is good
> enough
> > for a release.
On Oct 19, 2012, at 4:08 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/19/12 3:38 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 19, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/19/12 11:54 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
>>>
(3) Long email chains debating various points that appear to r
On 10/19/12 3:38 PM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
>
> On Oct 19, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/19/12 11:54 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
>>
>>> (3) Long email chains debating various points that appear to require Mentor
>>> attention. And I don't mean the RC7 vote thread. O
On Oct 19, 2012, at 2:26 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/19/12 11:54 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
>
>> (3) Long email chains debating various points that appear to require Mentor
>> attention. And I don't mean the RC7 vote thread. Once you get this correct
>> then future discussions will be
On 10/19/12 11:54 AM, "Dave Fisher" wrote:
> (3) Long email chains debating various points that appear to require Mentor
> attention. And I don't mean the RC7 vote thread. Once you get this correct
> then future discussions will be more about technical merits (maybe this one is
> already there
On Oct 19, 2012, at 11:01 AM, Om wrote:
> Mentors,
>
> As you have seen in the vote thread, we need 2 IPMC votes for the RC7 to be
> released. We have plenty of +1 votes and I think that this is good enough
> for a release. Can you please vote +1 or -1 as soon as possible so that we
> can do w
